Amid Controversy, Connecticut's First Black State's Attorney Leaves Office
Hartford State's Attorney Gail Hardy removed herself from consideration for a second term on Monday. The move follows the commission's four-day suspension of Hardy on June 18 for her role in the handling of four police-involved shootings. Hardy had been the Hartford State's Attorney for 13 years.
June 29, 2020 at 03:52 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Connecticut Law Tribune
Hartford State's Attorney Gail Hardy withdrew her name from consideration for an eight-year term Monday, before the Criminal Justice Commission voted on the matter, according to commission chairman and Connecticut Supreme Court Justice Andrew McDonald.
The seven-member commission announced Hardy's decision at about 3:15 p.m. on Monday.
The commission heard public comments via Zoom from numerous stakeholders this morning and afternoon.
The news follows Hardy's June 18 suspension for four days without pay for her involvement in the handling of several police-involved shootings. Hardy was suspended for her role in failing to report the findings of four police-involved shootings in a timely manner.
At the time, the state's NBC affiliate quoted McDonald as saying there was a "serious dereliction in duty for her inexcusable delay in submitting these reports." The shootings, the outlet reported, occurred between 2008 and 2012.
Hardy, who had been in her post for 13 years, was suspended without pay for June 19 and June 22-24. She returned to work on Thursday, and appeared before the commission Friday for four hours.
Hardy, who became the state's first Black state's attorney in 2007, couldn't be reached for comment Monday afternoon.
Before Hardy withdrew as one of the state's top prosecutors, the commission heard from her supporters and opponents.
Speaking in support of Hardy was Geraldo Parrilla, a member of the George W. Crawford Black Bar Association.
"She is a mentor, leader and advocate," Parrilla said Monday. "Attorney Hardy has opened the doors for black attorneys. Attorney Hardy has done her job with integrity and honorably. We ought to consider her entire body of work. We should not judge her competency on these cases alone."
Also voicing support for Hardy was former Connecticut attorney Corey Brinson.
Brinson said he had interactions with Hardy because he represented a man who Hartford police shot and injured.
"She was thoughtful and fair in the case in dealing with my client, who had mental health issues," Brinson said. "As someone who watched her and worked with her in her years as a prosecutor, she is very fair. I'd like to see Ms. Hardy get a second chance and not have her story end here."
There were also voices against the reappointment.
They included resident Randy Watson, who identified himself as a member of the Black Lives Matter movement. "I strongly oppose the reappointment of Gail Hardy. She has failed miserably. I feel the suspension is not enough, and she should not be reappointed," Watson said.
Another critic was Joe Verrengia, a Democratic member of the state's House of Representatives and co-chairman of the Public Safety Committee.
Verrengia said, in part: "I certainly appreciate the work of all of the State's attorneys in this state. But we must hold people in power accountable. I think if Ms. Hardy is reappointed, it would be a step in the wrong direction."
The board did vote to reappoint Maureen Platt to another term as Waterbury State's Attorney.
Related stories:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readAm Law 200 Firm to Defend PUMA in Latest Quarrel Over Patented Shoe Technology
Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Southern California Law Firms Boast Industry-Leading Revenue, Demand Through Q3
- 2AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 3Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 4Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 5'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250