State Bar Task Force Recommends Expanding Eavesdropping Powers to Hate Crimes
A New York State Bar Association task force report recommends adding hate crimes to the list of offenses that allow for eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants.
June 29, 2020 at 03:07 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A New York State Bar Association task force report recommends adding hate crimes to the list of offenses that allow for eavesdropping and video surveillance warrants.
The recommendation was outlined in a report from the association's Task Force on Domestic Terrorism and Hate Crimes. The task force was convened after an attack during a Hanukkah celebration in Monsey in which a man stabbed five people. The attacker had rushed into a rabbi's home.
One of the victims, Josef Neumann, died months following the attack, and New York lawmakers passed legislation against domestic terrorism in his name.
"Pervasive and insidious racism and race-based intolerance are grave injustices that cannot be tolerated," said Carrie Cohen, a partner at Morrison & Foerster and chair of the task force, in a statement. "Hopefully, this report can contribute to ensuring that people of every skin color, ethnicity, religion, and sexual orientation in New York are safe and adequately protected from hate crimes."
Officials say the state bar association was considering the topic before the Monsey attack, but the crime added impetus to the issue.
The report recommended expanding the list of offenses that allow for video surveillance and eavesdropping warrants to include hate crimes defined under § 485.05 of the state's Penal Law.
The report described video surveillance and eavesdropping as among the most powerful tools out there to disrupt criminal activity. They can be used to gather evidence of a crime during the preliminary stages and allow plots to be disrupted, according to the report.
"Eavesdropping and video surveillance authority could, if approved by a court in an appropriate case, enable law enforcement to infiltrate and disrupt these heinous crimes during the planning stages before great harm occurs," the report says.
The report noted that wiretaps generally can be initiated for offenses that underlie a hate crime, but the document said adding hate crimes to the list of designated offenses would fill the gap.
"Why not define a hate crime as one which is eligible for eavesdropping? [It] makes more sense than to try to juggle the preexisting crime to fit the eavesdropping statute," said Scott Karson, the association's president, in an interview Monday.
The task force report passed the association's House of Delegates on June 27, he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudges Push for Action to Combat Increasing Threats Against Judiciary
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 2Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 3Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
- 4Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
- 5Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250