Law Firms in Australia Grow Earnings Despite COVID-19
Australia has been insulated, in part because of ongoing work from the fallout of last's years Royal Commission into the banking sector and because Australia has not been as badly affected by COVID-19 as other parts of the world.
June 30, 2020 at 03:19 PM
5 minute read
Australia's larger law firms are on track for another strong year, with earnings increasing despite the COVID-19 economic crisis.
Benchmarking data on revenue, hours worked and demand collected by Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor reveals that average fees worked for April and May this year were up a combined 5.4% compared with the previous year.
For the 11 months to the end of May, fees worked—a proxy for revenue—was up 8.1%.
Australia has been insulated, in part because of ongoing work from the fallout of last year's Royal Commission into the banking sector and because Australia has not been as badly affected by COVID-19 as the United States, said Joe Blackwood, senior thought leadership analyst at Thomson Reuters.
Demand for legal services in Australia had slowed in the fourth quarter of the financial year, April to June, from the previous three quarters, although overall, the year was still strong, he said. Data for June is not yet available.
"Firms in other markets would be ecstatic to achieve the 3% growth we have seen in Australia over the last two months, let alone the 7% we have seen thus far in financial year 2020," Blackwood said. "We expect, barring an extremely significant increase in expenditure in June, healthy growth in profitability metrics, including profit margins."
Large firms have said that while some practice areas, such as transactions, had slowed, the work they already had in the words continued. Additionally, Australian companies rushed to raise capital at the start of the COVID-19 crisis and sought more advice on workplace health and safety and employment law.
And in what Blackwood says could be a harbinger of a broader economic slowdown, insolvency and restructuring was the strongest practice area in April and May. Demand was up 20.3% in April from the year before and 18.2% in May.
Several Australian firms have indicated they have continued to perform well, despite the effects of the pandemic.
Norton Rose Fulbright Australian managing partner Alison Deitz said that while transactional work in recent months has been down, other areas, such as restructuring deals, have increased.
Overall, the novel coronavirus pandemic hasn't had much impact on the firm's billings from the current financial year, and Deitz expects the firm will see an increase in its revenue over the previous year.
Separately, Chinese-Australia firm King & Wood Mallesons has not needed to reduce staff hours, cut salaries or reduce partner drawdowns
The data also reveals that partners have been working more hours than associates. Typically, associates work more hours. For instance, in the April to June quarter of last year, partners worked an average of 95 hours per month while associates worked 101 hours.
However, in April and May of this year, partners worked an average of 102 hours, compared with 100 for associates.
Blackwood said a similar trend is emerging in the U.S. and suggested a couple of possible reasons.
"One reason firms have pointed to is an increase in demand for advisory work that requires partners to perform," he said.
"Another theory is that partners are simply funneling less work down to their associates, perhaps in anticipation of demand slowdowns as the year progresses. This way they can ensure they are hitting their billable hour goals despite downturns that may occur within the market itself."
He also noted that by working an average of seven more hours per month when compared with the final quarter of last year, the larger proportion of work done by the higher fee-commanding partners has resulted in a jump in worked rate growth.
Australia, which has a population of around 25 million, has seen just 7,765 confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 104 deaths.
Cases have been declining, and social distancing restrictions have been lifted in most states, although a second surge of cases in the second most populous state of Victoria in recent days has resulted in the reintroduction of restrictions there, such as limiting family gathering numbers to five.
Law firms around the country have been reopening their offices, although many continue to take a cautious approach by giving staff the option of continuing to work at home and limiting the number of people in the office at any one time.
The IMF recently said the Australian economy will perform better than it had predicted near the start of the COVID-19 outbreak. In late June the global financial organization said it expects Australia's gross domestic product to contract by 4.5% this year, compared with its prediction in April of a 6.7% drop.
The IMF expects the rest of the world will suffer a 4.9% drop on average.
The Australian economy has been cushioned by generous government-funded wage subsidies for businesses that have suffered a revenue drop of 20% or more and by banks allowing homeowners to delay their home loan repayments. However, both of these measures are due to finish in September, raising questions about how the economy will continue to perform without that support.
At the same time that Australian firms' revenues were up, their overhead expenses were lower, according to the Peer Monitor data.
Staff pay was down 12.6% in April and May, with office expenses, marketing and business development, and recruiting all down by over 50%.
Thomson Reuters Peer Monitor is a legal industry benchmarking platform drawn from firms' financial and time billing systems. Sixteen Australian firms with an average lawyer head count of 510 took part in the program.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllClifford Chance Under Fire for Human Rights Assessment of Saudi Arabia World Cup Bid
5 minute readTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Big Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 2Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 3Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 4Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
- 5Bolstering Southern California Presence, Sidley Austin Settles Into Revitalized Downtown LA Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250