Lawyers Accused of Molotov Cocktail Bombing Can Return Home, 2nd Circuit Rules
Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman have been indicted on charges of arson and use of explosives, among other offenses. Each pleaded not guilty.
June 30, 2020 at 07:15 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Tuesday affirmed the ruling of a district court judge who found that the attorneys accused of firebombing an empty New York City Police Department vehicle can be released to home confinement, vacating an earlier stay that sent the lawyers to Brooklyn's Metropolitan Detention Center.
Judges Peter Hall and Gerard Lynch wrote that they "would not have necessarily reached the same conclusion" as U.S. District Judge Margo Brodie of the Eastern District of New York, who released Colinford Mattis and Urooj Rahman to home confinement on a $250,000 bond, but they were left without a firm conviction that Brodie committed clear error.
Judge Jon Newman dissented, writing that even if the court did not reverse based on clear error, it should remand so that the district court could make "some explicit indication" as to whether the presumption of detention had been rebutted.
The case has attracted attention across the legal community, with more than 50 former federal prosecutors and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers joining together on an amicus brief opposing the government's arguments.
Mattis was suspended from his job as an associate at Pryor Cashman pending the outcome of the criminal case, while Rahman worked as a tenants' attorney in Bronx Housing Court prior to her arrest.
More than 850 people currently or formerly affiliated with New York University School of Law, from which Mattis graduated, have signed an open letter describing the charges as politically motivated and calling for the pair's release.
Hall and Lynch noted that prosecutors submitted no evidence indicating that Mattis or Rahman had engaged in any criminal conduct other than the alleged Molotov cocktail attack, which prosecutors say took place May 30, during the first weekend of protests against police brutality and for racial justice in Brooklyn.
Mattis and Rahman have been indicted on charges of arson and use of explosives, among other offenses. Each pleaded not guilty during conference-call arraignments marked by the enthusiastic participation of their supporters, dozens or hundreds of whom crowded onto the phone lines.
Rahman's attorney, Paul Shechtman of Bracewell, said the Second Circuit's ruling will allow Rahman to resume caring for her mother at their home in Brooklyn.
"Urooj's family and hundreds of supporters could not be more pleased with today's decision that reunites her with her mother," he said in a statement. "It is the first step on the road to justice in this case."
Mattis' attorney, Sabrina Shroff, said Mattis' family is also thrilled to have him home.
"I had the pleasure of telling Colin's family that he was coming home and I can't begin to tell you the relief and joy when they heard the news," she said in a statement.
A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York declined to comment.
READ MORE:
Attorney Accused of Firebombing NYPD Vehicle Responds to Supporters During Arraignment
Supporters of Attorney Accused in Molotov Cocktail Case Speak Out During Arraignment
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute read'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
3 minute readLSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
7 minute readZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 2Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
- 3Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace
- 4Failure to Adequately Inform Patients
- 5'FTX' One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250