COVID-19 Brings Law Firm Mergers to a Halt
The last time Altman Weil's quarterly numbers were this bad, the legal industry was still dealing with the effects of the Great Recession.
July 01, 2020 at 03:59 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
No matter how you slice it, the COVID-19 pandemic has ruined the legal industry's voracious appetite for mergers and combinations.
Only seven law firm mergers and combinations were announced in the second quarter of 2020, according to a new report from Altman Weil. The last time the number has been that low in any given quarter was in 2010, when law firms were still feeling the effects of the Great Recession. In Q3 2010, Altman Weil tracked only five mergers.
Altman Weil's findings are in line with Tuesday's report from Fairfax Associates, which found that the pandemic will dramatically impact the number of mergers that are completed in the second half of the year. There's a correlation between their findings—the announcements Altman Weil tracks are reflected later in the completed deals Fairfax Associates tallies up.
It's only been within the last couple of weeks that Thomas Clay, a principal of Altman Weil, has been getting calls from law firms who are asking about potentially restarting their merger discussions and negotiations.
"It isn't as if they've removed it from their strategy. They've put it on hold," Clay said.
Similar to the Fairfax report, the deals Altman Weil tracked in Q2 2020 either involved large firms acquiring smaller ones—Littler Mendelson brought on a 20-lawyer firm in Warsaw, Poland, and Cozen O'Connor absorbed a 9-lawyer firm in Philadelphia—or small firms merging with other small ones.
It is significantly less risky and cheaper for a large firm to acquire a small firm than it is for two large firms to merge, Clay said. That's because the only thing that's up for negotiation in those acquisitions is compensation—a 10-lawyer firm isn't going to significantly change the strategy of the 700-lawyer firm absorbing it, he added.
"To the big firm, there's no real disruption to its business model. You plug in another group of lawyers and you keep going," Clay said.
Large firm mergers are risky and expensive, but a deal could happen if law firms become acclimated to the pandemic, Clay said. However, he noted that if such a deal were reached, it's unclear how the two firms will integrate if Big Law is still social distancing due to the novel coronavirus. For one, Clay said it's hard to get a sense of a firm's culture through videoconferencing calls.
In 2019, Altman Weil counted 20 merger announcements in the second quarter, with another 38 and 30 deals being announced in the third and fourth quarters, respectively. Clay said he doesn't believe the industry will approach those numbers at all.
One deal that's likely to show up in Altman Weil and Fairfax Associates' data for the third quarter is Much Shelist's combination with Zfaty Burns, a small business litigation firm based in Newport Beach, California. This deal has been in the works for years, according to Glenn Taxman, who heads Much's Orange County office.
"We knew COVID-19 would make the timing more challenging because both firms were relocating to new office space and tasks like orientations and trainings had to be handled remotely, but both firms believed the smart business decision was to stay on track," Taxman said in a statement.
|Read More
Report: Very Few Law Firm Mergers on Horizon for Rest of 2020
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250