Corporate Legal Departments Should Prepare for Heightened Fraud Risks
"Businesses are deciding when and how they can come back to work. And so it's really easy to begin to ignore the basics around compliance," said Don Fancher, an Atlanta-based principal at Deloitte.
July 02, 2020 at 01:53 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Disruptions and distractions related to the COVID-19 outbreak might have caused some executive teams and corporate legal departments to shift focus away from fraud-related risks and compliance, even as those risks are expected to ramp up over the next year.
"Businesses are deciding when and how they can come back to work. They're taking a lot of time and energy and a certain level of creativity to figure out how to do that. And so it's really easy to begin to ignore the basics around compliance," said Don Fancher, an Atlanta-based principal at Deloitte and the U.S. national and global leader for the firm's forensic advisory services.
A new Deloitte survey of more than 1,200 executives, many of whom are members of the C-suite, showed that more than half of respondents expect fraud, waste and abuse schemes to increase in the next year. Nearly 40% believed that improper payments would be the most common fraud risk associated with $2.2 trillion in government stimulus funding.
"Any payment outside of the normal course, whether it be fraudulent or just waste or abuse of the system, is a form of improper payment," Fancher said.
A recent example of improper payments would be fly-by-night companies that promised to provide N95 masks to health care providers, but only after receiving up-front payments, according to Fancher.
"They get paid and all of a sudden that distributor is gone and hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars that was to be used for PPE [personal protective equipment] is gone," he said.
As the fraud risks increase, in-house leaders and other executives need to be more vigilant than ever about making compliance and risk management top priority. They need to set a policy tone from the top by educating employees and vendors—even if doing so requires virtual training—about compliance, risk and financial crime prevention.
"You need to be continuing to put the right protocols in place," Fancher said. "It's also realizing that those protocols might need to be a bit different because everyone's working from home. The normal process of controls where everyone's in an office environment are no longer as applicable."
Legal departments also can turn to fraud monitoring technology and analytics tools to prepare for what lies ahead—and to help ensure that their compliance programs meet new Justice Department guidelines issued in June.
"They actually state the expectation that organizations have the resources in place to actively and continuously monitor for fraud, financial crime, bribery and corruption," Fancher said. He noted that in-house leaders should be asking, "How do we put in continuous monitoring around our transactions, overlaying those across our financial and enterprise systems?"
"If an organization hasn't considered that, now is a good time to consider putting those programs in place," he added.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
Transgender Woman Awarded $150K Default Judgment Against Corrections Officer for Alleged Assault
Legal Speak: A Convicted Felon is Coming to the White House. What Happens Now?
1 minute readAT&T General Counsel Joins ADM Board as Company Reels From Accounting Scandal
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250