Disciplinary Commission Says NY Judge Should Be Admonished Over Inappropriate Comments
During a conference in 2017 on a separate case, Gerber remarked that a defendant's daughter "was 'dressing for attention,' by which he meant 'for men to look at her,'" the commission reported.
July 02, 2020 at 03:30 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A state disciplinary commission has found that a town court justice in Rockland County made inappropriate comments and failed to disqualify himself from a case.
The state's Commission on Judicial Conduct on Thursday reported that Howard Gerber, a justice for the Clarkstown Town Court, should be admonished for the behavior.
Gerber, who agreed to the admonition, has served on the bench in the town court since 2007, the commission reports.
The commission found the judge made disparaging remarks about a probation department.
"Respondent now recognizes that he should have disqualified himself from [the case] after making the remarks," according to a determination from the commission.
During a conference, Gerber said he had problems with a probation department and said a department official was a "liar" who "perjured herself" while appearing before him in a previous matter, the commission reported.
During a conference in 2017 on a separate case, Gerber remarked that a defendant's daughter "was 'dressing for attention,' by which he meant 'for men to look at her,'" the commission reported.
After someone commented the daughter had worn yoga pants to court, the judge said "in words or substance to [a prosecutor]: 'I don't care what anybody wears … if you wear yoga pants to court, it's okay with me,'" according to the commission's determination.
"When [the prosecutor] did not respond, respondent said in words or substance, 'Oh, I should not have said that. Are there cameras in here?'" according to the determination.
In a separate incident when the judge was walking out of a courtroom, Gerber asked the prosecutor and her friend if they "want[ed] a room" and then offered "in words or substance to 'turn off the lights'" for them, according to the commission. The judge intended "to make an off-color joke," according to the determination.
The commission described the comments as "demeaning and inappropriate for a judge to make in a courtroom."
"We expect that [Gerber] has learned from this experience, will comply with his pledge to refrain from making inappropriate comments in the future and will act in accordance with his obligation to abide by all the Rules Governing Judicial Conduct," according to the commission's determination.
In a statement issued through an attorney, Gerber said he accepts their determination and his responsibility for his actions.
"I am keenly aware that it is my responsibility to avoid even the appearance of impropriety," he said in the statement. "I have learned from this unfortunate experience, and will endeavor to use such insight to further improve myself as a judge."
Commission Administrator Robert Tembeckjian issued a statement saying "there is no call for a judge to engage in sexual innuendo or make judgmental or juvenile remarks about the way women look or dress."
"Nor is it appropriate for a judge to preside over a matter in which he has gratuitously disparaged an essential participant," he said in the statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBaltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
3 minute readFederal Judge Sends Novel Damages Question in Employment Dispute to State Court
5 minute readCounty Reps: Appeal Likely Following State Court's Sales Tax Ruling for Retail Marijuana
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Weil Practice Leaders Expected to Leave for Paul Weiss, Latham
- 2Senators Grill Visa, Mastercard Execs on Alleged Anti-Competitive Practices, Fees
- 3Deal Watch: Gibson Dunn, V&E, Kirkland Lead Big Energy Deals in Another Strong Week in Transactions
- 4Advisory Opinion Offers 'Road Map' for Judges Defending Against Campaign Attacks
- 5Commencement of Child Victims Act at Heart of Federal Question Posed to NY's Top Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250