In Trump Book Lawsuit, Boutrous Argues Injunction Would Be 'Futile'
Mary Trump was sued June 26 by Robert Trump, who has argued that she is forbidden by a settlement agreement associated with her grandfather's will from publishing information about her relationships with the president, Robert Trump and their sister, former Judge Maryanne Trump Barry of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, without their consent.
July 03, 2020 at 12:36 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The injunction sought by President Donald Trump's brother is "no longer capable" of stopping the release of his niece's upcoming book about the president's family relationships, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partner Theodore Boutrous argued in court filings July 2.
And on Monday the book publisher moved up the release date for the tome by two weeks.
According to Boutrous, who is representing the Trump brothers' niece Mary Trump, publisher Simon & Schuster has already acted independently to print and ship thousands of copies of the book to retailers, meaning that any injunction from the court would be "futile."
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department on July 1 upheld a Dutchess County Supreme Court justice's temporary restraining order against Mary Trump but vacated the order issued against Simon & Schuster.
Mary Trump was sued June 26 by Robert Trump, who has argued that she is forbidden by a settlement agreement associated with her grandfather's will from publishing information about her relationships with the president, Robert Trump and their sister, former Judge Maryanne Trump Barry of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, without their consent.
In an affidavit signed July 2, Mary Trump wrote that she "lost any ability to prevent or delay the publication" of the book, "Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man," after Simon & Schuster formally accepted it in May. In addition, she wrote, Simon & Schuster is in control of printing, shipping and distributing the book to reviewers, booksellers and the news media.
The book had been set for publication July 28, but on Monday, the planned publication date was moved up to July 14, according to Simon & Schuster's website.
Attorneys representing Mary Trump, Simon & Schuster and First Amendment advocacy groups have argued in court papers that the book covers matters of public interest about which she has a right to speak under the First Amendment.
In a memorandum filed July 2, Boutrous argued that the settlement agreement's confidentiality provision should not be interpreted as a perpetual ban on family members' ability to speak about "issues of public concern, in particular where one of those family members has voluntarily made his life a public issue by running for and becoming president of the United States."
Judicial interference in the book's publication would be "historic" and "unprecedented," Boutrous wrote.
Boutrous also argued that the first copy of the settlement agreement, filed by Robert Trump's legal team, was redacted in a misleading way. A second copy of the agreement was filed under seal by the Gibson Dunn team.
"That the parties did not intend that the agreement impose the broad, sweeping, lifetime gag-order that plaintiff alleges is demonstrated not only by the agreement itself but the parties' conduct since its execution," Boutrous wrote. "Plaintiff and his siblings have made multiple public comments over the years regarding their family relationships."
Read more:
NY Appeals Court Keeps Block Against Mary Trump in Book Fight, But Lifts It for Her Publisher
First Amendment Advocates Protest 'Extraordinary' Order Blocking Publication of Mary Trump's Book
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFired by Trump, EEOC's First Blind GC Lands at Nonprofit Targeting Abuses of Power
3 minute read'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
3 minute readLSU General Counsel Quits Amid Fracas Over First Amendment Rights of Law Professor
7 minute readZoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com's Amanda Bronstad: 700+ Residents Near Ohio Derailment File New Suit, Is the FAA to Blame For Last Month's Air Disasters?
- 2Law Journal Column on Marital Residence Sales in Pending Divorces Puts 'Misplaced' Reliance on Two Cases
- 3A Message to the Community: Meeting the Moment in 2025
- 4Ex-Prosecutor Denies on Witness Stand That She Tried to Protect Ahmaud Arbery's Killers
- 5Latham's Lateral Hiring Picks Up Steam, With Firm Adding Simpson Practice Head, Private Equity GC
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250