Broward Lawyer's Threatening Message Lands Him a Suspension: 'You Will Never See Me Coming'
"You will never see me coming, and won't know what hit you when you realize what you've brought upon yourself," the referee's report quotes the attorney as saying.
July 06, 2020 at 04:08 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
The Florida Supreme Court suspended a Fort Lauderdale attorney for a pattern of misconduct and multiple offenses, including electronic messages that an "objectively reasonable person" would assume are meant to harass and intimidate.
James M. Potts Sr., of the Potts Legacy Law Group, represented residents of a condominium. His clients alleged the condo association treasurer was misusing the homeowners' association funds and refused to send Potts copies of the association's banking records.
But the attorney is the one in the hot seat after the high court suspended him for 60 days and placed him on probation for two years.
It is a harsher penalty than the court-appointed referee's recommendation of probation and a public reprimanded.
|'Preparing to throw down'
According to the referee's report, around May 6, 2017, Potts started sending condo association treasurer Ruben Vicente a series of unprofessional and disparaging emails. Potts believed Vicente would cancel the homeowners' election at Heritage Condominium, which would be bad for Potts' client, according to court documents.
The attorney told Vicente to retain a lawyer because Vicente was facing "serious exposure to civil liability."
"You can't hide from law enforcement. You can't hide from the state attorney looking for you when you are in contempt of court, and you especially can't hide from me," the referee's report quotes Potts as saying in the email. "You will never see me coming, and won't know what hit you when you realize what you've brought upon yourself."
|Read the Florida Supreme Court order:
|The referee's report stated that Potts told Vicente to "commune with the Lord, because you will need all the help you can get."
More emails followed, then text messages requesting an explanation for the cancellation of the homeowners' election and that urged Vicente to resign, the referee's report stated. Three days later, Vicente told Potts that his "harassment" was unacceptable.
"You are to refrain from contacting me directly ever again," Vicente texted to Potts. "This behavior is unauthorized and is to stop immediately."
In response to Vicente's comments, court pleadings claim Potts said that he has "the State of Florida on my side preparing to throw down." The attorney also allegedly stated if Vicente were innocent, then "Why not come to the parking area at [sic] 2 so we can discuss this like real adults?"
The referee provided context, explaining that the homeowners' election was to be held at 2 p.m. in the parking area referred to in the email. Potts claimed his statement was not a physical threat, as Vicente interpreted it and as The Florida Bar described it in its initial complaint.
Kevin Tynan, a partner at Richardson & Tynan in Tamarac who represented Potts, said the statement was a matter of interpretation, which is why the referee's report dropped a count that was based on that statement.
Tynan said Potts is in the process of making the transition into the suspension phase and is planning to return to his law practice afterward.
"This is really a nasty comment case," Tynan said. "My guy was just over the top with his communications."
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDivided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
5 minute readAm Law 200 Firm to Defend PUMA in Latest Quarrel Over Patented Shoe Technology
Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250