There Are New Faces Leading MDLs. And They Aren't All Men.
According to Law.com research, women made up 40% of lawyers leading four or more MDLs created from 2016 to 2019. Although most of the top firms remain the same, some have spread out appointments to several lawyers, including women. "These are badass attorneys who are also women," said Mike Morgan, of Morgan & Morgan.
July 06, 2020 at 10:53 PM
14 minute read
When lawyers were tossing around names to submit to the judge for a potential plaintiffs leadership team two years ago in a multidistrict litigation proceeding, Amy Keller at Chicago's DiCello Levitt threw her name in. After all, she had experience, serving as co-lead counsel in the MDL over the Equifax data breach.
"One of the attorneys, who was a man, made the comment of how I had already been appointed co-lead counsel in two other cases, and he was concerned I would not be able to handle a third case," Keller recalled in an interview. "I found that very interesting because never in my career have I ever heard someone say, 'Oh, can he handle another case?'"
Keller said "thinly veiled sexism" still exists in the mass tort and class action bar. But for her part, she moved on to other cases, and has notched six MDL appointments in the course of four years.
Keller's trajectory as a woman in the male-dominated MDL bar might be exceptional, but a new analysis of appointment orders for all federal MDL proceedings initiated from 2016 through 2019 suggests it may be indicative of a growing trend.
Women made up 40% of the 30 lawyers who received appointments to more than three MDLs during that period. The data gathered by Law.com show that many large plaintiffs firms—once reliant on a single, often male and white, veteran senior partner to lead the MDL practice—are spreading out appointments to a younger and a more diverse set of lawyers.
Keller tied with Melissa Emert, formerly of Stull, Stull & Brody, and now at Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, as the woman with the highest number of appointments for the period examined by Law.com. The most any attorney received during the period was 10.
"These are badass attorneys who are also women," said Mike Morgan, of Morgan & Morgan, which ranked No. 2 in number of MDL appointments, with 16 appointments going to six men and two women. "When we look at the way the MDLs form, it was largely done before anybody got to the courtroom: The stereotypical, with cigars and whiskey, and people deciding who goes where. Then they'd say, 'Judge, great news! We've decided.' That doesn't happen today."
One area that still lags: minority attorneys. While more nonwhite lawyers have gotten appointments to MDLs, those at the very top are few. Of the top 30 on Law.com's list, only two identified as nonwhite.
|The New Players
A significant number of the top 30 lawyers do not come from big plaintiffs firms.
While some firms have done well diversifying leadership of MDLs, others have shown "egregious abuses," putting women forward for the appointments but not giving them the power to make decisions after that, said Lesley Weaver of Bleichmar Fonti & Auld in San Francisco.
Weaver, who made the top 30 list with four MDL appointments, left a career at larger plaintiffs firms in 2016 because she wanted to get more leadership positions in complex litigation, including MDLs.
The larger firms always put forward "repeat players," she said. "There was not a lot of room for grass to grow."
She said it's still a struggle for new players.
"Every day, in every interaction, you have to prove yourself," she said. "That never goes away. Every day is an opportunity to succeed or fail. You have to keep pushing, and you have to continue."
Much of the push for change has come from judges, particularly as those appointed to MDLs also have become less white and male. In an MDL over the heartburn medication Zantac, for instance, U.S. District Judge Robin Rosenberg of the Southern District of Florida appointed 26 lawyers May 8, nearly half of whom were women and four were minorities, plus a "leadership development committee" that will provide "mentorship and experience."
Senior U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of the Northern District of California, in his appointments of lawyers in the Volkswagen emissions MDL, created in 2015, "changed the arc of my career," said Weaver, who was put in a leadership position on the massive case.
"I was well known to people," she said. "I just hadn't been appointed and wasn't considered a player."
But the fight to get recognized doesn't end at getting an appointment, she said. Even after joining the Volkswagen team, she had to compete with veteran attorneys to get work on the case. She had help from key lawyers, like Cabraser, who was lead counsel, but she also used her fluency in German to start investigating connections in the case.
"I ran to the open field and made myself valuable," she said. "The way you get the repeat is to get people to see you."
Tina Wolfson, of Ahdoot & Wolfson in Los Angeles, who earned four MDL appointments, started by getting leadership positions in cases that were not necessarily MDLs. In particular, she focused on class actions targeting companies, like Neiman Marcus and Experian, over data breaches.
She also was persistent in getting her name out there.
"Just keep doing it," Wolfson said, emphasizing the importance of getting "good at your craft." "And if you want to be the next Elizabeth Cabraser, do what she did, which is work on important cases and keep throwing in your application. And don't be intimidated by not being on someone's team."
|The Next Generation
When U.S. District Judge William Orrick III of the Northern District of California asked lawyers to submit applications to lead the multidistrict litigation against electronic cigarette maker Juul, he emphasized the importance of diversity. The request drew several prominent plaintiffs firms, including Lieff Cabraser.
But Cabraser purposely didn't put her own name in the hat. Instead, her junior partner Sarah London sought the role of lead counsel—and she got it.
"I could put my name up, and maybe I'd get picked because I'm a known quantity," Cabraser said. "But there needs to be a mix, needs to be a balance. We need younger people with energy and new ideas and the spirit of innovation and work ethic."
Many of the top firms, defined by Law.com as those that got 10 or more MDL appointments, had leadership appointments spread across several lawyers, including Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Rafferty & Proctor, which had a dozen lawyers get appointments, all but one male, and tied with Lieff Cabraser for the No. 1 spot.
"It's not just that we're shuffling who the repeat players are," Cabraser said. "We're widening the scope of leadership."
But that doesn't mean the more familiar names have disappeared. In her Oct. 16 application for the Juul leadership post, London mentioned that Cabraser and other senior partners at her firm would "devote their considerable experience to this case."
Veteran MDL attorney Joe Rice said he sometimes files affidavits to support lawyers at his firm, Motley Rice, or takes a phone call verifying their work on a case with him.
"There's an effort among a number of firms to diversify the MDLs, but at the same time not sacrifice the MDL," Rice said. "That's the fine line the MDL judge has to draw, is to make sure that the plaintiffs, the injured parties in the MDL, have the best representation available but, at the same time, try to have diversity in that."
Motley Rice had 13 appointments go to 10 lawyers, five of whom were women. Rice himself was appointed to two MDLs.
The firm has been sending its more junior lawyers to MDL seminars and conferences, encouraging those in their fourth or fifth years of practice to develop skills to get appointments, Rice said.
Firms with the most MDL appointments to women were Robins Kaplan, which had five women attorneys get eight appointments, while four men got six; Weitz & Luxenberg, with five appointments held by four male attorneys and eight by four women; and Lockridge Grindal Nauen, whose 11 appointments went to three women and two men.
Among the top firms is longtime player Seeger Weiss, whose partner, Chris Seeger, a veteran in MDLs, ranked No. 1 with 10 appointments. He and partner Dave Buchanan got all 12 appointments for the firm.
Seeger insisted, however, that his firm has tried to diversify its applicants for leadership and that the firm has several other lawyers working on an MDL than just him.
"We've had partners apply for appointments," he said, naming colleagues Parvin Aminolroaya and Jennifer Scullion, "and they haven't yet had that much success, but we're still trying. And we're working hard to promote our younger partners."
He also cautioned against appointing attorneys who do not have enough experience, calling some of his experiences working with new MDL lawyers a "mixed bag."
"I have worked with some new, young people who have come in and been given opportunities and completely dropped the ball, fallen out of the case and really wanted no part of it after putting a toe in it," he said, "and I've seen some spectacular new names rise to the top."
Burch acknowledged that the "old guard" could be moving on at some firms in favor of the "next generation of leaders," but that also means most of the firms getting MDL appointments are the same as before.
"My concern wasn't just identity diversity but cognitive diversity and thinking in different ways," she said. "If you have the same law firms that are training people in the same sort of ways, which presumably they are, then you might have less of that than if you had an influx of new firms and faces."
Many of the traditional firms in MDLs have focused on products liability matters, disasters and consumer fraud. But practices new to MDLs, such as data breach cases and antitrust litigation, both of which are growth areas in class actions, have dominated recent MDL appointments.
"It definitely opens the field to people who wouldn't be in mass torts, but there's a lot of firms that generally are involved in MDLs that don't have expertise in antitrust and data breaches," Rice said.
Some firms have spread out to those specialties to get some of that work. At Morgan & Morgan, for instance, the busiest partner was John Yanchunis, whose six appointments include MDLs over data breaches affecting Yahoo, Equifax and Capital One.
"His ability to walk in and having that experience and background in it has helped, not only in the data world but class and MDL world," Morgan said. "He merges those two experiences in his own career."
|A Mostly White Field
One area where change has been especially slow is the lack of ethnic diversity in MDLs.
Although the shortage of minorities is a problem in the legal industry overall, many firms have placed nonwhite attorneys in positions subordinate to those who are in leadership roles, Keller said.
"The attorneys running the case day to day are fully capable, have great ideas, come from a totally different perspective from your own," she said, "and it's time we take a good hard look at how we, the plaintiffs' bar, recruit and encourage and select people to be on these leadership slates."
Roland Tellis, a South Asian man and one of the few minorities who made the top 30 list, with four MDL appointments, called the plaintiffs bar in MDLs "a relatively small club."
Tellis, head of Baron & Budd's class action group, switched from the defense bar about a decade ago. He said he broke into MDLs by seeking out positions on plaintiffs steering committees, rather than for lead counsel.
"Everybody wants to be co-lead in every case, but there's a process," he said. "And if you can apply for PSC spots and show your skills, that leads to opportunities to build your track record, build your reputation. Then, you have a story to tell the next time."
From 2016 to 2019, he got appointments to serve on the plaintiffs executive committee in the opioid litigation and as co-lead counsel in cases against Wells Fargo and airbag manufacturer ZF-TRW.
But he acknowledged that the MDL bar remains largely white.
"Lawyers of color still lag, and it's too bad," he said. "I'm often reminded of that when I look around the table."
Ben Hancock contributed data analysis for this report.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAm Law 200 Firm to Defend PUMA in Latest Quarrel Over Patented Shoe Technology
Apple Asks Judge to 'Follow the Majority Practice' in Dismissing Patent Dispute Over Night Vision Technology
Who Got the Work: 16 Lawyers Appointed to BioLab Class Action Litigation
4 minute readAttorneys Go to DC Federal Court Seeking Damages for Plaintiffs in Oct. 7, 2023, Attack on Israel
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Events for Georgia Lawyers
- 2'There is No Time to Waste': Matt Gaetz Withdraws From AG Nomination
- 3The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 4Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 5In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250