IBM Counsel and Others Weigh Slack's Impact on Corporate Investigations
A Hanzo webinar held Thursday looked at how the prevalence of collaboration platforms like Slack are impacting corporate investigations. While the process is more or less the same, investigators will likely find themselves with a lot more surface area to cover and potentially some new leads.
July 09, 2020 at 03:46 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
Companies were embracing the use of alternative communications platforms like Slack long before COVID-19, but the onset of the pandemic has made those tools even more central to day-to-day operations. Hanzo's "Internal Investigations in the Age of Collaboration and Remote Work" panel held Thursday delved into implications for corporate investigations and examined how corporate legal departments were adapting.
The good news is that the process of launching an investigation doesn't appear to have changed much from a process standpoint, however, Slack and other collaboration platforms have introduced significantly more surface area to cover. Whereas random groupings of employees may have once been using Slack of their own accord, some organizations are now formalizing the practice organization-wide.
Panelist Stacey Blaustein, counsel at IBM, indicated that the company rolled out the mandatory use of Slack in January 2020 as a way to supplement email. "Over the last few months that we've all been working remotely there's been a huge increase in these collaborative environments and the way people communicate and collaborate has shown tremendous expansion across the enterprise," Blaustein said.
She called the use of collaboration tools "business as usual" and it does seem like IBM and other companies have figured out ways to fold Slack and its ilk into their investigation process, even finding new opportunities to collect relevant data. Kimberly Quan, global head of e-discovery and digital forensics at Juniper Networks, said the company is focused on leveraging intelligence from the myriad tools it is already paying for and possibly detecting risky behavior before it becomes a problem.
For example, employees unaware that they may be exfiltrating data on Slack can be alerted and retrained. "I would say that has been a big catalyst lately in really trying to use the tools and technology to be the eyes and ears and put the intelligence together using AI or other applications of technology," Quan said.
Such intelligence can also prove useful during an investigation, with Slack potentially opening up some data points that can't be leveraged in email. For example, Slack has audit logs that can show who posted or deleted certain comments and at what time, which Blaustein noted is useful for piecing together context.
She recommended that investigators gather as much information as possible by cross-checking different data sources—if a Slack message was sent by laptop or phone, for instance—in an attempt to derive the author's intent.
"It's not just content, it's the actions you are looking for to create a story," she said.
Of course, some Slack messages are easier to make sense of than others. Kyle Kelly, senior e-discovery and litigation specialist at Coinbase, pointed to the difficulties that investigators face in trying to derive the meaning behind various Slack emojis in real time. "Does your metadata say that it's like a smiley face wink or does it say [somebody] is something that is not nice?" he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThese Law Firm Leaders Are Optimistic About 2025, Citing Deal Pipeline, International Business
6 minute read‘A Force of Nature’: Littler Mendelson Shareholder Michael Lotito Dies At 76
3 minute readRemembering Am Law 100 Firm Founder and 'Force of Nature' Stephen Cozen
5 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 2Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 3Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 4Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 5Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250