Uncertain Future Has Law Firms on Edge; A Slew of Suits Over State Shutdowns; Roberts Keeps 'Em Guessing: The Morning Minute
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up. WHAT WE'RE WATCHING 'SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY' - Law firms are relieved…
July 10, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
'SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY' - Law firms are relieved that COVID-19 has not been as financially ruinous for the industry as initially predicted, and there's no question Paycheck Protection Program loans have helped many firms stave off dire austerity measures, but we're still a long way off from a post-pandemic party. As Dylan Jackson reports, with PPP money dwindling and the recession's timeline still blurry as new coronavirus cases flare up, firm leaders are still feeling plenty of pressure. "There's still substantial uncertainty around the 'second wave' and the long-term economic impact," said Sullivan & Worcester managing partner Joel Carpenter. "Supplemental unemployment is up at the end of the month. We're cautiously optimistic, but we still don't know where all this is going to take us."
OPEN SEASON - COVID-19 may not be doing wonders for the economy, but it has given rise to at least one cottage industry: suing state governments over orders shuttering nonessential businesses. As Angela Morris reports, an analysis by Law.com affiliate Texas Lawyer found that at least 15 lawsuits (and probably more) have been filed by business owners in Texas challenging Gov. Greg Abbott's shutdown orders. Meanwhile, a similar lawsuit in Pennsylvania, in which business owners sought an emergency injunction against Gov. Tom Wolf's emergency declarations, was rejected by the state Supreme Court in April. The Pennsylvania justices also shot down an attempt last week by the Republican-controlled legislature to end Wolf's shutdown order. JUSTICE OF THE PEACE - This SCOTUS term was not without its chippy moments between Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and his colleagues, but yesterday's dual 7-2 rulings on access to President Donald Trump's financial records showcased Roberts' knack for forming cross-ideological majorities in politically fraught cases. As Marcia Coyle writes, Roberts' patented middle-of-the-road approach means there was no clear winner in either of yesterday's cases and the door remains open for further litigation. If you were rooting for one side or another in the case, you likely came away disappointed. But if you were pulling for the court to preserve the appearance of its own independence, congratulations—your team won.
EDITOR'S PICKS
What the Trump Tax Records Rulings Mean for His Other Lawsuits By Jacqueline Thomsen
Judge Emmet Sullivan Contests DC Circuit Decision Ordering Dismissal of Flynn Case By C. Ryan Barber
Georgia Courthouses Close Anew as Staff, Judges Test Positive for COVID-19 By R. Robin McDonald
'Help Do Justice': Big Law Commits to Litigation Fight Against Racist Policing By Jacqueline Thomsen
Merck Taps Veteran Health Care General Counsel for New Spinoff By Dan Clark
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
EQUITY IN THE EQUITY TIER - Meganne Tillay reports that Ropes & Gray, Withers, and Irwin Mitchell are the U.K. firms with the highest proportion of female partners, according to a Law.com International diversity survey. The study shows women make up on average one in four partners at top firms in the U.K. Data from 51 of the largest firms found the trio topped the rankings for U.K. female partners overall, and also took three of the top four spots — along with Boies Schiller Flexner — when looking solely at equity partners. Magic Circle firms, however, did not perform as well. None made it into the top 25 for total partner numbers. Meanwhile, at 11 of the 51 firms surveyed, less than one in five partners were women.
WHAT YOU SAID
"Work has been my life for the past few months. You basically get a few hours off to get some sleep."
— Megan Ryan, of Nassau Health Care Corp., describing what it's like to be the top lawyer, executive vice president and chief compliance, privacy and ethics officer for a hospital and health care system during a pandemic.
➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSecurities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
3 minute readTrump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
3 minute readLandlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250