Uncertain Future Has Law Firms on Edge; A Slew of Suits Over State Shutdowns; Roberts Keeps 'Em Guessing: The Morning Minute
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up. WHAT WE'RE WATCHING 'SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY' - Law firms are relieved…
July 10, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
'SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY' - Law firms are relieved that COVID-19 has not been as financially ruinous for the industry as initially predicted, and there's no question Paycheck Protection Program loans have helped many firms stave off dire austerity measures, but we're still a long way off from a post-pandemic party. As Dylan Jackson reports, with PPP money dwindling and the recession's timeline still blurry as new coronavirus cases flare up, firm leaders are still feeling plenty of pressure. "There's still substantial uncertainty around the 'second wave' and the long-term economic impact," said Sullivan & Worcester managing partner Joel Carpenter. "Supplemental unemployment is up at the end of the month. We're cautiously optimistic, but we still don't know where all this is going to take us."
OPEN SEASON - COVID-19 may not be doing wonders for the economy, but it has given rise to at least one cottage industry: suing state governments over orders shuttering nonessential businesses. As Angela Morris reports, an analysis by Law.com affiliate Texas Lawyer found that at least 15 lawsuits (and probably more) have been filed by business owners in Texas challenging Gov. Greg Abbott's shutdown orders. Meanwhile, a similar lawsuit in Pennsylvania, in which business owners sought an emergency injunction against Gov. Tom Wolf's emergency declarations, was rejected by the state Supreme Court in April. The Pennsylvania justices also shot down an attempt last week by the Republican-controlled legislature to end Wolf's shutdown order. JUSTICE OF THE PEACE - This SCOTUS term was not without its chippy moments between Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. and his colleagues, but yesterday's dual 7-2 rulings on access to President Donald Trump's financial records showcased Roberts' knack for forming cross-ideological majorities in politically fraught cases. As Marcia Coyle writes, Roberts' patented middle-of-the-road approach means there was no clear winner in either of yesterday's cases and the door remains open for further litigation. If you were rooting for one side or another in the case, you likely came away disappointed. But if you were pulling for the court to preserve the appearance of its own independence, congratulations—your team won.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
What the Trump Tax Records Rulings Mean for His Other Lawsuits By Jacqueline Thomsen
Judge Emmet Sullivan Contests DC Circuit Decision Ordering Dismissal of Flynn Case By C. Ryan Barber
Georgia Courthouses Close Anew as Staff, Judges Test Positive for COVID-19 By R. Robin McDonald
'Help Do Justice': Big Law Commits to Litigation Fight Against Racist Policing By Jacqueline Thomsen
Merck Taps Veteran Health Care General Counsel for New Spinoff By Dan Clark
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
EQUITY IN THE EQUITY TIER - Meganne Tillay reports that Ropes & Gray, Withers, and Irwin Mitchell are the U.K. firms with the highest proportion of female partners, according to a Law.com International diversity survey. The study shows women make up on average one in four partners at top firms in the U.K. Data from 51 of the largest firms found the trio topped the rankings for U.K. female partners overall, and also took three of the top four spots — along with Boies Schiller Flexner — when looking solely at equity partners. Magic Circle firms, however, did not perform as well. None made it into the top 25 for total partner numbers. Meanwhile, at 11 of the 51 firms surveyed, less than one in five partners were women.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"Work has been my life for the past few months. You basically get a few hours off to get some sleep."
— Megan Ryan, of Nassau Health Care Corp., describing what it's like to be the top lawyer, executive vice president and chief compliance, privacy and ethics officer for a hospital and health care system during a pandemic.
➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250