Big Law Rushed to Sue Over ICE's Policy for International Students During COVID. Now Trump Officials Are Dropping It.
Big Law firms, including Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Crowell & Moring, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, had challenged the policy in court.
July 14, 2020 at 04:14 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The Trump administration is nationally rescinding guidance that would have required international students to leave the United States if their coursework was held entirely online this upcoming fall during the COVID-19 pandemic, after the policy was heavily challenged in several federal courts.
The announcement was made at the start of a hearing Tuesday in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts, where attorneys with Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr were expected to argue on behalf of officials at Harvard and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction against the policy.
Instead, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs opened the hearing by announcing that attorneys from both sides had come to agreement to rescind that guidance on a national level, which mooted the TRO and preliminary injunction requests.
The guidance, announced last Monday, was challenged in federal court almost immediately, first with Harvard and MIT's lawsuit in Massachusetts.
Johns Hopkins University last week filed a similar complaint in Washington, D.C.'s federal trial court with lawyers from Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan. The University of California system filed their own suit Friday with Crowell & Moring attorneys, and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher lawyers filed a similar complaint Monday on behalf of 20 colleges and universities on the West Coast.
Eighteen attorneys general also joined the mounting legal fights with a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts on Monday.
Burroughs said Tuesday that the agreement means a more flexible policy for international students instated this spring will return, and that she will keep the Harvard and MIT case open.
The guidance was met with widespread backlash from higher education institutions and other industries. Colleges and universities are grappling with how to hold class in the fall due to the COVID-19 outbreak, with some saying they'll offer a hybrid of in-person and online coursework and others choosing to offer only remote classes.
At least some of the lawsuits alleged the policy was an attempt to force campuses to remain open in the fall, despite the lack of information about how safe it would be for students, faculty and other employees due to the pandemic.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
A Jury to Determine Whether Stairs Were Defectively Designed in Injury Case, State Appellate Court Rules
5 minute readLSAT Administrator Sues to Block AI Tutor From Using ‘Famous, Distinctive’ Test Prep Materials
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Exploring the Opportunities and Risks for Generative AI and Corporate Databases: An Introduction
- 2Farella Elevates First Female Firmwide Managing Partners
- 3Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 4In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 5A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250