Law Schools See Late Applicant Boost After Spring COVID-19 Slowdown
The combination of a new online version of the LSAT and recent college graduates looking to ride out a tough job market in law school has helped the national applicant pool recover to its previous size.
July 14, 2020 at 01:59 PM
5 minute read
The national law school applicant pool has recovered from its pandemic-induced slump, thanks to a surge in applications over the past six weeks.
The number of aspiring lawyers applying to American Bar Association-accredited law schools for the fall is up a third of a percent from the same time last year, and up more than 3% from two years ago, according to the latest figures from the Law School Admission Council. As of July 13, more than 61,500 people had applied for a seat at an ABA law school for the coming academic year. With the application cycle days from wrapping up, it seems this year will end on par with the previous one. That represents a reversal from early June, when the number of applicants was down 2.5%.
"The last few years have all been good years anyway, so now we will be at or above last year, and that's good news for legal education," said council president Kellye Testy on Tuesday. "We're busier at this time of year than we have ever been in our history. We've seen a good surge both for this fall, and already for the next fall."
There are two primary drivers of the late rush of applications: Canceled in-person Law School Admission Tests in March and April coupled with the introduction of an online version of the test in May; and recent college graduates making a late decision to pursue law school because of the difficult entry level job market.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the typical pattern of law school applications because first-time LSAT takers who were scheduled to sit for the exam in March and April had to wait until late May or June to take the new LSAT-Flex, which is a shorter version of the LSAT delivered online. The LSAT-Flex has been given three times since May and is scheduled for August as well. The number of national applicants lagged from the previous year throughout April and mid-May, but it began to climb once scores from the LSAT-Flex became available, the council data show. The LSAT-Flex has been taken 33,000 times since it debuted, Testy said. That helps explain the late rush of applications, alongside the college graduates who have changed their plans amid the pandemic.
"Some applicants were thinking, 'OK, maybe I was going to take the LSAT for first time and apply for 2021 or in the future. But maybe that job I had lined up is not exactly there anymore so I'll go ahead and apply now,'" Testy said. "It's a combination of us getting the [LSAT-Flex] launched, and working with our schools so that they had flexibility to still take applicants who weren't originally thinking of applying for the fall."
This year's applicant pool may also be stronger. According to the latest council data, the number of applicants with LSAT scores of 140 to 164 is down more than 3% from last year. Meanwhile, applicants with LSAT scores of 165 to 180 are up more than 8%. Applicants with scores of 175 to 180 are up nearly 13%, though they comprise a relatively small portion of the overall applicant pool. The national applicant is also more diverse.
"One of the things I'm particularly happy about because of my equity commitment is that into May and first of June, Black applicants were lagging 5.3%, and now they are slightly ahead," Testy said. "Same thing with Latinx applicants—they were down, and now they are 2.3% ahead."
Despite those promising numbers, it remains unclear whether a larger portion of admitted students this year will make a late decision to defer their studies or forego law school altogether because some or all of their courses will be administered online instead of in person. Many law schools are still finalizing their fall plans, and a small but growing group has said they will be fully remote. Among them are Harvard Law School; the University of California, Berkeley School of Law; and the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. Testy said that many law school have reported higher than normal deferrals this cycle. But most schools maintained larger waitlists in anticipation of more deferrals and should not face problems in filling out their classes this fall.
Separately, the council this week unveiled a new option under which first-time test takers may review their LSAT score before they get reported to law schools. LSAT takers who sign up for the Score Preview option may choose to cancel their score before it goes on their Law School Admission Council transcript, which is part of their application. Test takers have six calendar days to decide whether the cancel their scores. Score Preview will cost an extra $45 and will be available starting in August. Testy said the change was spurred by research on testing anxiety and the fact that such anxiety is especially pronounced in groups that are underrepresented in the law, such as first-generation college students.
"One of the things our research shows is that if a first-time test taker knows they can cancel that first score if they want to, it significantly reduces test anxiety and helps people perform to their best," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readExits Leave American Airlines, SiriusXM, Spotify Searching for New Legal Chiefs
2 minute readLatest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute read'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
Trending Stories
- 1'Knowledge of Mismatch:' Fed Judge Offers Guidance on How to Hold Banks Accountable for Erroneous Transfers
- 2PAGA Claims Must Now Be 'Headed'
- 3Million-Dollar Verdict: Broward Jury Sides With Small Business
- 4'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
- 5'Careless Execution' of Presidential Pardons Freed Convicted Sex Trafficker, US Judge Laments
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250