Law Schools See Late Applicant Boost After Spring COVID-19 Slowdown
The combination of a new online version of the LSAT and recent college graduates looking to ride out a tough job market in law school has helped the national applicant pool recover to its previous size.
July 14, 2020 at 01:59 PM
5 minute read
The national law school applicant pool has recovered from its pandemic-induced slump, thanks to a surge in applications over the past six weeks.
The number of aspiring lawyers applying to American Bar Association-accredited law schools for the fall is up a third of a percent from the same time last year, and up more than 3% from two years ago, according to the latest figures from the Law School Admission Council. As of July 13, more than 61,500 people had applied for a seat at an ABA law school for the coming academic year. With the application cycle days from wrapping up, it seems this year will end on par with the previous one. That represents a reversal from early June, when the number of applicants was down 2.5%.
"The last few years have all been good years anyway, so now we will be at or above last year, and that's good news for legal education," said council president Kellye Testy on Tuesday. "We're busier at this time of year than we have ever been in our history. We've seen a good surge both for this fall, and already for the next fall."
There are two primary drivers of the late rush of applications: Canceled in-person Law School Admission Tests in March and April coupled with the introduction of an online version of the test in May; and recent college graduates making a late decision to pursue law school because of the difficult entry level job market.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted the typical pattern of law school applications because first-time LSAT takers who were scheduled to sit for the exam in March and April had to wait until late May or June to take the new LSAT-Flex, which is a shorter version of the LSAT delivered online. The LSAT-Flex has been given three times since May and is scheduled for August as well. The number of national applicants lagged from the previous year throughout April and mid-May, but it began to climb once scores from the LSAT-Flex became available, the council data show. The LSAT-Flex has been taken 33,000 times since it debuted, Testy said. That helps explain the late rush of applications, alongside the college graduates who have changed their plans amid the pandemic.
"Some applicants were thinking, 'OK, maybe I was going to take the LSAT for first time and apply for 2021 or in the future. But maybe that job I had lined up is not exactly there anymore so I'll go ahead and apply now,'" Testy said. "It's a combination of us getting the [LSAT-Flex] launched, and working with our schools so that they had flexibility to still take applicants who weren't originally thinking of applying for the fall."
This year's applicant pool may also be stronger. According to the latest council data, the number of applicants with LSAT scores of 140 to 164 is down more than 3% from last year. Meanwhile, applicants with LSAT scores of 165 to 180 are up more than 8%. Applicants with scores of 175 to 180 are up nearly 13%, though they comprise a relatively small portion of the overall applicant pool. The national applicant is also more diverse.
"One of the things I'm particularly happy about because of my equity commitment is that into May and first of June, Black applicants were lagging 5.3%, and now they are slightly ahead," Testy said. "Same thing with Latinx applicants—they were down, and now they are 2.3% ahead."
Despite those promising numbers, it remains unclear whether a larger portion of admitted students this year will make a late decision to defer their studies or forego law school altogether because some or all of their courses will be administered online instead of in person. Many law schools are still finalizing their fall plans, and a small but growing group has said they will be fully remote. Among them are Harvard Law School; the University of California, Berkeley School of Law; and the University of Southern California Gould School of Law. Testy said that many law school have reported higher than normal deferrals this cycle. But most schools maintained larger waitlists in anticipation of more deferrals and should not face problems in filling out their classes this fall.
Separately, the council this week unveiled a new option under which first-time test takers may review their LSAT score before they get reported to law schools. LSAT takers who sign up for the Score Preview option may choose to cancel their score before it goes on their Law School Admission Council transcript, which is part of their application. Test takers have six calendar days to decide whether the cancel their scores. Score Preview will cost an extra $45 and will be available starting in August. Testy said the change was spurred by research on testing anxiety and the fact that such anxiety is especially pronounced in groups that are underrepresented in the law, such as first-generation college students.
"One of the things our research shows is that if a first-time test taker knows they can cancel that first score if they want to, it significantly reduces test anxiety and helps people perform to their best," she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAm Law 200 Firm to Defend PUMA in Latest Quarrel Over Patented Shoe Technology
Health Care Giants Sue FTC, Allege Lina Khan Using Loaded Process to Vilify Pharmacy Benefit Managers
3 minute readChicago Midsize Firm Will Combine With Miami Boutique To Form Antitrust Powerhouse
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1After Mysterious Parting With Last GC, Photronics Fills Vacancy
- 2Latham Lures Restructuring Partners From Weil, Paul Weiss
- 3Haynes Boone, Hicks Thomas Get Dismissal of $1.3B Claims in 2022 Freeport LNG Terminal Explosion
- 4Immigration Under the Trump Administration: Five Things to Expect in the First 90 Days
- 5'Radical Left Judges'?: Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden's Judicial Picks
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250