George Floyd's Estate Files Civil Rights Lawsuit Against Minneapolis, Alleging Excessive Force, Faulting Police Training
According to the complaint, Minneapolis knew by 2012 that the maneuver could lead to death, but never warned officers about the dangers. Instead, the lawsuit said, the city engaged in unconstitutional "patterns and practices" that placed citizens, particularly in Black and minority communities, at risk.
July 15, 2020 at 06:20 PM
3 minute read
The estate of George Floyd, whose death sparked national protests over racism and police violence, on Wednesday sued the city of Minneapolis and the four police officers criminally charged with his killing, alleging civil rights violations and excessive force.
The lawsuit, filed in Minnesota federal court, claimed that the city's police department ignored warning signs and had long trained its officers to use neck restraints as a form of authorized "non-deadly force" when carrying out arrests.
The complaint was surfaced by Law.com's Legal Radar.
According to the complaint, Minneapolis knew by 2012 that the maneuver could lead to death, but never warned officers about the dangers. Instead, the lawsuit said, the city engaged in unconstitutional "patterns and practices" that placed citizens, particularly in Black and minority communities, at risk.
"By policy, the MPD permitted and condoned the use of both conscious and unconscious neck restraints by its officers from at least April 15, 2012 until June 8, 2020," the suit said.
Floyd's family is represented by civil rights attorney Ben Crump, as well as lawyers from at least six other law firms in Minnesota and other states, according to the complaint.
Floyd died in police custody May 25, while handcuffed and lying face down on a city street. Video of the incident showed former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin kneeling on the back of the man's neck for nearly nine minutes while he cried out that he was unable to breathe.
Chauvin has since been charged with manslaughter and second- and third-degree murder, and three other officers on the scene were charged with aiding and abetting Floyd's death. All four have been fired from the police force.
The three-count suit alleged that all four officers violated Floyd's Fourth and 14th Amendment rights in carrying out the arrest and that Minneapolis had fostered a culture of racism and impunity within its police department. It seeks a money judgment against the former officers, as well as special damages against the city and the appointment of a receiver to ensure that the city "properly trains and supervises" its police.
Meanwhile, demonstrations against police violence and racism continue across the country, now in their seventh week.
Read More:
New York State Bill Would Require Police Officers to Carry Liability Insurance
AG James Rolls Out Police Reform Recommendations in Preliminary Report
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChicago Law Requiring Women, Minority Ownership Stake in Casinos Is Unconstitutional, New Suit Claims
5 minute read'Lookback Window' Law for Child Abuse Cases Constitutional, State High Court Finds
6 minute read'Erroneous Rulings'?: Wilmer Asks 4th Circuit to Overturn Mosby's Criminal Convictions
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legal Restrictions Governing Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace
- 2Failure to Adequately Inform Patients
- 3'FTX' One Year Later: The Impact on Examiner Practice in Bankruptcy Courts
- 4Gen AI Legal Contract Startup Ivo Announces $16 Million Series A Funding Round
- 5DOJ's Flawed Thinking in Challenging HPE-Juniper Merger
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250