In-House Counsel Should Create Re-Exit Plan to Prepare for COVID-19 Case Spike
"I think general counsel will be well received if they focus on not only what can't be done, which might mean coming into a building, but potentially what may be able to be done," Jonathan Segal, a partner at Duane Morris in Philadelphia, said.
July 16, 2020 at 04:08 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
In-house counsel should consider what their employees are allowed to do while working from home when creating a re-exit plan as cases for the new coronavirus spike again and companies prepare for a second wave of the virus.
According to data gathered by Gartner Legal and Compliance in May and June, only 3% of in-house counsel indicated their companies have a re-exit plan finalized. More than half, at 53%, of respondents said they are in the middle of working on a re-exit plan.
"The first critical thing that any in-house lawyer dealing with this needs to understand is that they're going to be making decisions on imperfect information," Jonathan Segal, partner and managing principal at Duane Morris in Philadelphia, said.
The guidance from different state governments are changing on an almost weekly basis and in-house counsel should create broad plans that can change as quickly as the health guidances change. Just this week states that were on the path to reopening have put stringent restrictions on travel and amended how indoor businesses operate. Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf on Wednesday required employees to work from home if they could. Earlier in the week, California Gov. Gavin Newsom imposed restrictions on indoor businesses.
In-house counsel will have to answer the question of what employees are allowed to do when re-exiting the office and working from home.
"People are anxious about the fact that they're not having the connections or contact that build relationships or generate sales," Segal said.
Employees may want to know what restrictions are being placed on them for nearby travel that is work-related.
"I think general counsel will be well received if they focus on not only what can't be done, which might mean coming into a building, but potentially what may be able to be done," Segal said.
Additionally, for re-exiting, employees should be broadly reminded of issues such as time reporting, expenses for nonexempt employees, workers' compensation and data privacy and security.
Despite the risks of having to send employees back home because of COVID-19, in-house counsel are still planning ways to bring them back. The data gathered by Gartner indicates 95% of in-house counsel said their companies will not bring their employees back to work until social-distancing arrangements can be made for the office. Of the 95 in-house counsel polled, 79% indicated adequate personal protective equipment should be in place before employees return to the office.
"In most cases, however, things will look very different for employees, and employers will need to make significant changes to workspace planning and acquire new resources such as PPE," Brian Lee, managing vice president in the Gartner legal and compliance practice in Washington, D.C., said in a statement.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNLRB Blisters Skilled Care Home Chain That Terminated Nursing Assistant Who Complained About Wages
6 minute readEmployers Race to File NLRB Petitions to Gain Upper Hand in Union Organizing
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250