Law.com Trendspotter: How Some Firms Are Drawing on Personnel Lessons From the Great Recession
"You will hear managing partners and leaders say one of their biggest mistakes was to cancel summer associate programs or freeze hiring [in the last recession], because it left them with a gap in their talent pool," said Marcie Borgal Shunk, a law firm consultant and founder of the Tilt Institute.
July 20, 2020 at 01:21 AM
4 minute read
The Trend:
Despite the unsettling uncertainty of the current economic downturn, many law firm leaders appear to be staying mindful of an important lesson from the last recession: don't go overboard on personnel cuts or hiring freezes because, eventually, you're going to wish you hadn't.
The Driver:
For years, even after the economy began to improve, the ghosts of the Great Recession haunted many law firms that had hastily cut head count and halted associate and lateral hiring.
This time around, there seems to be more of an awareness that a lot of those attorneys and staff that might appear expendable in the current economic climate will eventually be missed when things start to turn around.
The Buzz:
>> After a recent survey by Wells Fargo Private Bank found that U.S. law firms have so far largely avoided financial ruin amid the COVID-19 pandemic, Joe Mendola, senior director of sales for Wells Fargo Private Bank Legal Specialty Group, pointed to relatively modest cuts to staffing as a heartening sign, particularly compared to the Great Recession.
"That's a little bit of a difference from past economic downturns. Firms have not reacted with large cuts overall. It could very well be that expectation that there will be a pick up in the latter part of the year from pent-up demand," Mendola told ALM's Dan Packel in June.
Earlier this month, Amdie Mengistu, senior consultant of partner practice at Whistler Partners, made a similar observation to ALM's Samantha Stokes, noting that some firms are even still hiring lateral partners.
"During the last few months of the pandemic, compared to 2008, we've had less layoffs and more lateral hiring. It hasn't been as catastrophic as we expected," he said.
>> One of the clearest examples of law firms taking the long view when it comes to hiring and recruiting is the number of midsize firms forging ahead with full-length summer associate programs amid the pandemic.
As Marcie Borgal Shunk, a law firm consultant and founder of the Tilt Institute, explained to ALM's Christine Simmons, midsize firms are intent to keep their summer programs intact this year in order to "continue to diversify the talent pool."
"You will hear managing partners and leaders say one of their biggest mistakes was to cancel summer associate programs or freeze hiring [in the last recession], because it left them with a gap in their talent pool," Shunk noted.
>> Meanwhile, as some law firm leaders are seeking to avoid repeating past mistakes, others are trying to recreate previous successes.
Philadelphia's Cozen O'Connor, for example, has hired aggressively for both transactional work and class action litigation, adding 25 attorneys, including eight shareholders since March 1. The firm was similarly opportunistic in 2009, bringing on nearly 70 attorneys from crumbling Wolf Block.
"That was the worst economy of our lifetime," executive chairman and CEO Michael Heller recently told Dan Packel. "We were willing to make that investment, and it's paid off. We take that similar philosophy now when other firms are looking to tighten belts."
That included a bet on the real estate practice, which was experiencing very weak demand at the time.
"When no one wanted to touch real estate, [Cozen O'Connor] did touch real estate," Garrison & Sisson recruiter Dan Binstock added. "For years, they were benefiting from that."
Haynes & Boone, which has added 11 new partners and a total of 39 attorneys since the start of 2020, was also aggressive during the Great Recession. In 2009, the firm was able to consummate the acquisition of IP boutique MacPherson, Kwok, Chen & Heid following a four-year courtship, establishing a presence in California for the first time. The following year, it took just four weeks to seal the deal with a six-partner group of Paul Hastings partners in New York in which the firm long held interest.
"We've stuck with the plans that we've had, and we've been able to maximize those," Powers told Packel about the firm's approach in both the last recession and the current one. "Any time there is a market disruption and you are a beacon of stability within that disruption, you can show that stability."
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute readGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 2Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 3Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 4‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
- 5Litera Acquires Workflow Management Provider Peppermint Technology
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250