Law Firms Draw On Recession Lessons; Nadler's Uphill Battle Over Trump's Pardon Powers; The Bias 'Baked Into' Risk Assessment Tech: The Morning Minute
The news you need to start your day.
July 20, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
RECESSION LESSONS - As anyone who's ever made three easy payments of $29.99 for a kitchen knife set they saw on a late night infomercial can attest, sometimes you gotta learn the hard way (those things could not cut through a soda can). Despite the unsettling uncertainty of the current economic downturn, it seems a number of law firms are determined not to repeat the personnel mistakes they made during the last recession, such as hastily cutting headcount, freezing hiring and cancelling summer associate programs. Meanwhile, several other firms are looking to recreate past successes by taking the same aggressive and opportunistic approach to hiring today that they did a decade ago. In the latest edition of Law.com Trendspotter, we look at how law firms are applying Great Recession lessons to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BLOOD FROM A STONE - Jerry Nadler is certainly fired up over President Donald Trump's commutation of Roger Stone's prison sentence—but the House Judiciary Committee chair's efforts to do something about it may end up flaming out. Nadler has accused Trump of tossing his longtime friend a lifeline as a "thank you" gift for obstructing the investigation into the president's own alleged wrongdoing (sort of a quid bro quo, if you will) and has vowed to investigate the grant of clemency, as well as to consider legislation that would restrict similar moves in the future. But, as Jacqueline Thomsen reports, former congressional attorneys say Nadler and his committee face a pretty epic uphill battle, thanks in part to the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling on the limits of congressional subpoenas.
THE RISK OF RISK ASSESSMENT - Risk assessment tools are used in jurisdictions across the country to aid in determining the likelihood of recidivism among criminal defendants. But should they be? As Rhys Dipshan and Victoria Hudgins report, there is intense debate around that question, with proponents arguing that the tools can help expose (and therefore address) bias in the criminal justice system while detractors argue that the technology actually exacerbates the problems that have always existed. To the latter group, risk assessment instruments are plagued by the same fundamental flaw inherent in so many other data analysis tools: garbage in, garbage out. Both judges and risk assessment tools are "relying [on] and using court-provided and criminal information, [and] both sources of those information are biased," said Colin Doyle, staff attorney at the Harvard Law School's Criminal Justice Policy Program, who works on pretrial reform and bail issues. "Whether you're a judge or an algorithm, that bias is baked into your thinking about predicting future crimes."
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Fatal Shooting at New Jersey Federal Judge's Home By David Gialanella
John Lewis Wasn't a Lawyer—but He Reshaped the Law By Jonathan Ringel
Citing 'Chaos' in Legal Profession, City Bar Urges NY Court to Provide Certainty By Christine Simmons
Guess What They'll Be Wearing to Court for Mask Lawsuit By Katheryn Tucker
Federal Judge Denies Defenders' Bid for Temporary Order to Pause New York City's In-Person Court Proceedings By Jane Wester
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
KONEXO'S NEXT MOVE - Eversheds Sutherland's alternative legal services provider Konexo is certainly not being secretive about its growth strategy. Konexo head Graham Richardson told Meganne Tillay it hopes to launch its first base in Europe post-Brexit, with the Netherlands and Germany possible locations for the offering. "We are considering the potential to expand Konexo's global offering," Richardson said. "With a strong presence in the UK and Asia, and following our recent launch in the US, exploring options in mainland Europe, particularly post-Brexit, makes sense." But Richardson was careful to note that the company is still "in very early stages of discussions, with a number of other factors still to consider."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
|"It is time to face reality. The pandemic has no set timetable. The bar exam is not worth saving. The time, resources and money required to administer a remote online exam, one that is likely discriminatory and unfair, should be funneled into other alternatives."
|— Susan Smith Bakhshian, professor and director of bar programs at LMU Loyola Law School, reacting to the California Supreme Court's decision to set an online-only bar exam for October and to permanently lower the score needed to pass the test.➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Many Legal Jobs Will Be Affected by AI? Law Firms Can't Agree
DLA Piper Names Corporate Lawyer Gerry Williams as Co-US Managing Partner
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Nicholas M. DePalma and Christian R. Schreiber of Venable have stepped in to represent CP Management Services, CRS RB4 Holdings and other defendants in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 30 in Virginia Eastern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of Daito Kentaku USA. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton, is 1:24-cv-01538, Daito Kentaku USA, LLC v. Comstock Partners, LC.
Who Got The Work
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs partner Andrew J. Pulliam has entered an appearance for Steve Jensen in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The action, filed Aug. 30 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Law Office of Perry A. Craft on behalf of Timothy Robins, accuses the defendant of writing a worthless check for over $94,000 for the sale of auctioned goods. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eli J. Richardson, is 3:24-cv-01064, Robins v. Jensen et al.
Who Got The Work
Lane Powell shareholder Pilar C. French has entered an appearance for Penney OpCo LLC in a pending consumer class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 26 in Oregon District Court by Hattis & Lukacs, alleges that the company markets fictional discounts for certain products. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai, is 6:24-cv-01414, Gamble v. Penney OpCo LLC.
Who Got The Work
Donald L. Carmelite and Coryn D. Hubbert of Marshall Dennehey have stepped in to defend the City of York, Detective Roland Comacho and Detective Lisa Daniels in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Middle District Court by Levin & Zeiger on behalf of Noel Matos Montalvo, seeks damages for the amount of time that Montalvo was incarcerated over five years for the exonerated killing of his common law wife. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson, is 1:24-cv-01459, Montalvo v. City of York, et al.
Who Got The Work
Joseph M. Englert, Brian E. Pumphrey and M. Laughlin Allen of McGuireWoods have entered appearances for Bank of America NA in a pending class action. The action was filed Aug. 26 in Georgia Northern District Court by Podhurst Orseck; Webb, Klase & Lemond; Crabtree & Auslander; and Morrison + Associates on behalf of the representative of the beneficiaries of the Arthur N. Weinraub Trust, a trust which contains residential real property. The suit accuses the defendant of overcharging the trust by selecting unnecessary and/or excessively priced insurance for the property. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr., is 1:24-cv-03780, Weinraub v. Bank of America, N.A.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250