Hundreds of New York Law Professors Endorse Emergency Diploma Privilege
A group of faculty from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law circulated a letter in asking state lawmakers to allow graduates to bypass the bar exam that garnered more than 300 signatures from colleagues across the state.
July 22, 2020 at 03:40 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
The push for an emergency diploma privilege in New York is picking up steam, with more than 300 law school professors joining the fray.
The professors on Tuesday sent a letter to New York State Court of Appeals Chief Judge Janet DiFiore and several key state law makers endorsing a temporary diploma privilege that would allow law graduates to bypass the bar exam amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Their letter comes less than a week after the deans of all 15 American Bar Association-accredited law schools requested a diploma privilege. The court on July 16 announced that the planned in-person bar exam on Sept. 9 and 10 was canceled but did not provide alternative licensure plans beyond the extension of a program in which law gradates may practice under the supervision of a licensed attorney.
"We commend the Court of Appeals for responding to this unprecedented crisis by canceling the in-person bar exam scheduled for September," reads the letter from the law professors. "But because the Court has not yet decided what will replace the canceled exam, 2020 law school graduates and others who planned to sit for the September bar are now in an extremely difficult position."
A group of faculty from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law organized the letter and circulated it to colleagues at other law schools over the weekend, said professor Alexander Reinert in an interview Wednesday. "We got to 300 pretty quickly," he said, noting that the professors who signed on likely comprise at least half of all full-time law faculty in the state.
Reinert said the Cardozo organizers were inspired by the emergency diploma privilege advocacy that legal educators in other jurisdictions have done. The introduction of legislation that would establish an emergency diploma privilege for law graduates was another catalyst for the professors to weigh in, Reinert said
New York State Senator Brad Hoylman and State Assemblywoman Jo Anne Simon have introduced parallel bills that would allow law graduates to be licensed without having the take the exam. Hoylman and Simon could not be immediately reached Wednesday for comment, but Hoylman on Tuesday tweeted that he is reaching out to fellow legislators and sharing stories from law graduates left in limbo.
"More people have to understand the stakes here, especially for immunocompromised students, and those who could barely afford the process as it was," he Tweeted.
Utah, Washington and Oregon have adopted emergency diploma privileges during the pandemic, and on Wednesday Louisiana joined that list.
Law graduates themselves have been advocating for an emergency diploma privilege since March, though the Court of Appeals has thus far rejected such action. Instead, the court first postponed the July exam until September and extended the supervised practice rule that allows law students and recent graduates to work under the watch of a licensed attorney. But the path to licensure in New York is unclear at the moment. In announcing the cancellation of the planned September exam, DiFiore said she has convened a working group to make recommendations to the court on alternatives. That group will considering using the abbreviated online exam being offered by the National Conference of Bar Examiners on Oct. 5 and 6, as well as an emergency diploma privilege. The working group is expected to deliver its recommendation in early August.
But the letter from the New York law professors raises concerns about using the online exam—which a growing number of jurisdictions plan to administer, including California, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Maryland.
"While administering an on-line exam mitigates some of the serious health concerns posed by in-person administration, it will only amplify the inequities that have been laid bare by the COVID-19 pandemic," their letter reads.
For example, online bar takers may face challenges finding a quiet place to take the exam or having a reliable Internet connection. And there is no way for graduates to study and perform as well on the test amid the intense stress brought on by COVID-19, national protests over police violence and systemic racism, and economic upheaval, they wrote.
"Diploma privilege is the most humane response for aspiring attorneys," the letter reads. "And, with provisions such as enhanced continuing legal education requirements, the public can have great confidence that our newest New York attorneys will be more competent than ever to serve our community well."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'What Is Certain Is Uncertainty': Patchwork Title IX Rules Face Expected Changes in Second Trump Administration
5 minute read'No Evidence'?: Big Law Firms Defend Academic Publishers in EDNY Antitrust Case
3 minute readLaw Firms Are Turning to Online Training Platforms as Apprenticeship Model Falters
'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250