Another Wave of Australian Capital Raisings Coming as COVID-19 Fallout Continues
As the economic impacts of the coronavirus crisis linger, companies may seek to raise more capital for liquidity or for acquisitions and growth.
July 23, 2020 at 04:10 PM
5 minute read
Australia's unprecedented wave of capital raisings at the outset of the COVID-19 crisis will be followed by another wave of companies seeking to raise capital as economic impacts of the crisis linger longer for some companies and others seek capital for acquisitions and growth.
Following a "deluge" of capital raisings in the first half of the year, lawyers say there is likely to be another busy period for capital raisings after companies report their earnings over the next month or so.
"We would expect to see some companies that had been hoping or expecting improved financial performance may not realize that goal and so they need to go back to the capital markets to raise equity and to get their balance sheet in order and to set them up to continue to operate," said Robert Pick, a capital markets and mergers and acquisitions partner at local corporate firm Allens.
The economic impact of the novel coronavirus on Australia has been severe and may become more severe following a second outbreak in Victoria state, which has Australia reporting a record daily number of cases after it had previously suppressed the virus.
Companies will wait until after they have reported their earnings so they will be able to fully disclose their financials without having to issue a prospectus to raise more funds, Pick said. But he expects the rush for companies to bolster their balance sheets will be less urgent and that later this year some companies will start to raise capital for mergers and acquisitions of other businesses that are struggling.
"There might also be businesses that look at their business and operations and decide to either divest underperforming businesses or non-core business, and that can lead to M&A and the need for funding," he said.
Tech companies could also raise money to fund growth as the use of their services increases during the coronavirus lockdowns.
Australia corporate firm Clayton Utz is working on several capital raisings and initial public offerings for tech companies, said Stuart Byrne, a securities law and capital markets partner at the firm.
"More of our processes at the moment are what I call positive raisings rather than defensive, and that certainly is different from what it was earlier in the year and a positive sign for the economy," he said.
Many companies stopped issuing earnings guidance or retracted those they had issued at the beginning of the pandemic, but Clayton Utz is now advising some companies on whether they should resume the practice. While guidance isn't necessary for a capital raising, Byrne said it can make it easier by boosting investor confidence.
A rush of capital raisings from March kept Australian law firms' capital markets teams busy even as other practice areas slowed down. Over A$26 billion was raised in the 15 weeks between March 18 and June 30, 2020, according to a report by Herbert Smith Freehills titled "COVID-19 capital raisings: what we learned."
The 80 raisings of A$25 million or more had an average size of A$333 million.
Most of the raisings were undertaken by companies in sectors most affected by the coronavirus crisis—resources, consumer discretionary, information technology and real estate.
Companies raising cash included National Australia Bank raising A$3 billion, Newcrest Mining raising A$1.1 billion, Flight Centre Travel Group raising A$701 million, and construction and development company Lendlease raising A$1.15 billion.
More than half of the raisings were preemptive, to provide companies with liquidity and position them for growth. About a quarter were to address immediate liquidity needs, the HSF report stated.
Herbert Smith Freehills partner Michael Ziegelaar, who is co-head of equity capital markets in Australia, also expects another round of raisings, but said it may not be quite so large.
"We don't think it will be as large as the first rush because the first rush was quite large and a majority of those who wanted to raise funds have probably already done so. Also, businesses have had more time to consider the impact of COVID … and plan accordingly," he said.
The HSF report found companies chose the "simplest and quickest ways to raise capital in these uncertain times. Some 80% was raised by a placement and share purchase plan—the issue and sale of new shares to institutional and retail investors.
However, Zeigler said if factors such as volatile market conditions and lack of investor appetite make it difficult to raise funds in the future through traditional means, such as placements and share purchase plans, companies might raise funds by issuing shares to private investors, such as private equity. "It will be a shift in the type of work we do," he said.
Companies seeking to bolster their balance sheets will likely include real estate, financial services, and retail without an omnichannel, or cross-channel content strategy, given the challenges they may face due to COVID, he said.
The surge in capital raisings came as regulators in Australia loosened rules to temporarily allow companies to do placements equal to 25% of their issued stock, up from 15%. The concession has now been extended until November, which the lawyers said would continue to support more raisings.
Read More
Capital Markets Lawyers Busy as Companies Rush to Raise Funds
Further Surge Of Australian Capital Raisings On Horizon, HSF Report Finds
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute readGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readLaw Firm Sued for $35 Million Over Alleged Role in Acquisition Deal Collapse
3 minute read4th Circuit Upholds Virginia Law Restricting Online Court Records Access
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250