Bar Director Proposes Stripping Larry McDougal of His Texas Bar Spokesman Role
In August or September, the board of the State Bar of Texas will discuss stripping President Larry McDougal of his spokesman duties, because of his online comments that offended many attorneys.
July 28, 2020 at 02:55 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Larry McDougal Sr. Photo: State Bar of Texas.
One of the most controversial proposals out of Monday's State Bar of Texas board of directors meeting would have stripped President Larry McDougal of his role as the agency's spokesman because of his online comments that have offended many Texas lawyers.
The issue lead to the bar board's first tie vote in three years, and ended with an agreement to postpone a vote until a future specially called meeting in either August or September. The delay will give the board's legal counsel a chance to review the idea and advise the board about potential legal issues.
McDougal's online comments said wearing a Black Lives Matter T-shirt to the polls violated a state law against electioneering. Another comment from 2015 called Black Lives Matter a "terrorist group." Another comment wrote that a female attorney was "hot" in one image but looked like a "meth head" in another. A fourth Facebook post was a photo of a police officer kneeling on a man's neck with a caption, "Justice happens before the trial."
He has apologized and pledged to take action to heal the division that his words have caused.
Noting that the bar president acts as a spokesman for the bar, Director Alistair Dawson said that McDougal can't be the bar's spokesman when there are serious questions about his appropriate judgment and communications. Dawson called on McDougal to resign.
He said the board has the authority to decide McDougal's duties, and it should no longer allow him to speak on behalf of the state bar. Dawson made a motion for the board to take the public spokesman duties away from McDougal and reassign them to the bar's executive director, board chairman, past president and president-elect.
But Director Rob Crain said that while he agreed with the sentiment, he opposed the motion because it wasn't presented in writing to the bar board's attorney. The motion may have First Amendment implications and bring potential litigation, he explained, which is why the board should get the advice of its attorney first.
Dawson did not oppose the delay, and the bar board voted to table his motion, send it to the board's attorney for review and issue a report at the board's next meeting on Sept. 24.
Later in the meeting, Director Santos Vargas moved that the bar board hold a special meeting, before the September board meeting, to again consider Dawson's motion to remove McDougal's spokesman duties.
Vargas' motion asked bar staff to schedule the special meeting during a time that McDougal, who will be getting cancer treatment in the near future, could attend.
Many directors spoke out against the motion, preferring to wait until September. But others said the board needed to take urgent action.
"Our members … have taken an entire day to listen to us today and they probably feel that nothing was accomplished. We have to push this to a finish line, to the goal post," said Director Diane St. Yves.
Director Andres Almanzán added that if Dawson's motion passed and McDougal's spokeman role was removed, then other representatives would begin speaking for the bar sooner rather than later.
Almanzán said, "How many opportunities is the president going to be given to speak on behalf of the Texas bar between now and Sept. 24?"
Director Steve Fischer said that punishing someone by suspending their right to speech as an elected official could violate legal precedent. It could bring liability to the bar, he said, which is why Fischer was opposed.
The board took a roll call vote on the motion to have an earlier meeting to vote on the motion to slash McDougal's spokesman role.
It was a tie.
"We haven't had a tie on a vote in three years," said Chairman Charlie Ginn.
When there's a tie, the chairman of the board must cast a vote to break it.
The motion passed when Ginn voted yes. He explained that bar staff told him they were willing and able to hold the earlier meeting.
He noted, "The motion, as presented, is to work with Mr. McDougal to find a date."
Related stories:
Lawyers Call On Texas Bar President to Resign Over Black Lives Matter Comments
McDougal Must Go? Directors Call for Texas Bar President's Ouster Amid #BLM Controversy
Amid Controversy, Texas Minority Lawyers Call for Action Against Racism in Profession
'Shame Is Not Strong Enough': Texas Bar Meeting Sees 61 Speakers Line Up to Address Larry McDougal's Online Comments
Texas Bar Board Pledges Action to Erase Systemic Racism, Boost Diversity After Marathon Meeting Over Larry McDougal's Comments
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2024/07/lease-agreement-767x633.jpg)
Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules
4 minute read![State Appellate Court Settles Fee Battle Between Former Co-Counsel in Patent Litigation State Appellate Court Settles Fee Battle Between Former Co-Counsel in Patent Litigation](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/11/Fee-Dispute-767x633.jpg)
State Appellate Court Settles Fee Battle Between Former Co-Counsel in Patent Litigation
5 minute read![Return to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals Return to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/96/29/eb515cc14d2287895f23c199c345/spd-headshot-1-767x633.jpg)
Return to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals
1 minute read![Internal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates Internal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/corpcounsel/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2023/02/Cunningham-767x633.jpg)
Internal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1As They Dissolve the Firm, Equity Partners in Houston Trial Firm Hodges & Foty Dispute Over Access to Bank Accounts
- 2How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Always Be Willing to Work Harder Than the Person Next to You,' Says Esther Cho of Stradley Ronon
- 3People in the News—Feb. 10, 2025—Flaster Greenberg, Tucker Arensberg
- 4The Support Center for Child Advocates Welcomes New Executive Director
- 5'Shame on Us': Lawyer Hits Hard After Judge's Suicide
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250