From Six Months to Six Weeks: Lateral Hiring Is Speeding Up
Hiring partners are finding the benefits of virtual interviews outweigh the costs and expect to keep Zooming with potential laterals even after the pandemic recedes into memory.
July 29, 2020 at 03:50 PM
7 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
In normal times, law firm partners looking to make a lateral move, particularly to a firm with a national presence, can expect to spend substantial time in the air. That's not the case right now. And cutting out that travel is serving to compress the timeline for bringing new attorneys on board.
Some recruiters and firm leaders anticipate that a growing comfort with virtual meetings will result in a permanent shift in how hiring is done, even when travel is no longer something to fear.
That means a process that once took at least six months could well become significantly shorter, sometimes as short as six weeks, said San Francisco-based recruiter Avis Caravello. And the benefits can extend after the hiring process is over.
"One thing most people don't realize is that when you come out of the recruiting process as a lateral, you're completely exhausted. You've been on airplanes for months, you're meeting tons of people," Caravello said. "Now, candidates go into the on-boarding process a lot more fresh than they did in the old days."
According to Caravello and other recruiters, most partner-level lateral moves take a minimum of six months from the start of discussions to finalizing the move. For groups or particularly high-earning partners, that figure will often hit nine months. And much of that time is simply spent by the attorneys on the move and their potential new colleagues getting familiar with each other. That generally meant visits to two or three key offices and meetings with a slew of partners at each.
"That's been replaced by Zoom," said New York-based recruiter Neil Handwerker of N Legal Search.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo managing partner Bob Bodian has been active in hiring since the start of the pandemic, most recently bringing aboard five insurance litigators from Squire Patton Boggs.
He said that while his firm has historically been able to move faster than the standard of six months, the time frame is even more compressed at present.
"The experience here is that it's much easier to get availability," Bodian explained. "You're not setting up in-person meetings, which require more of a time commitment, where to get from one office to another you need to carve out a large chunk of time."
The same goes for Armstrong Teasdale, which has relied, at least in part, on virtual recruiting to bring on roughly 30 laterals thus far in 2020. As the firm has expanded into Boston and Salt Lake City, managing partner David Braswell identified pros and cons with meeting candidates over a computer screen.
"I don't think it's as effective," he said. "There are a lot of things that you find in person that may not be apparent in the conversation: their body language, the way they carry themselves, whether they walk with an air of conviction or slumped shoulders and a downcast gaze."
The limits are also apparent in the reverse direction, when candidates meet Braswell on the computer in his basement office.
"They don't get to see our team, the tone and vibe of the place, the interaction of our team members," he continued. "I do think a lot is lost in the process."
Nonetheless, when compared to putting together travel arrangements, the comparative ease of arranging a Zoom conversation is unquestionable. That's particularly the case when Braswell, who's based in Saint Louis, is looking to ensure that colleagues from outposts like Las Vegas and Boston meet a new candidate. And even in a one-office firm, where onerous travel burdens aren't an inherent part of the lateral hiring process, the shift to virtual meetings can speed the process.
New York City midsize firm Warshaw Burstein has also been hiring during the pandemic, recently adding partners focused on intellectual property and tax work. Managing partner Fred Cummings said that while there's little difference between arranging a potential lateral's initial group interview with the firm's managing committee via the Blue Jeans platform and the mechanics of bringing her into the office to meet in person, subsequent one-on-ones with other recent arrivals or lawyers in the candidate's practice get scheduled faster.
"Our candidates are generally New York-based candidates," Cummings said. "But I think just the fact of not requiring people of coming into the office has accelerated the interview part of the process."
Hiring partners are also seeing silver linings in the new normal.
"You get to know a little bit about someone when you're getting to know someone on a Zoom call," Braswell continued, referencing the backdrop, their casual dress and even family members dropping by in the background. "The tone on a virtual interview is different. People are more relaxed. When you're on the hot seat, in a room full of several suits asking questions, that can be stressful."
Caravello echoed this point, highlighting the value of meeting new candidates and partners in their own environments.
"You're meeting the dog, the kids, the spouse, the postman, who knows," she said. "It gives them a more human feel and allows for connections to be made more quickly."
Combine this with greater speed and less stress on candidates, and Caravello believes that virtual hiring will outlast the coronavirus pandemic.
"Many firms I've worked with, they might not ever go back to the old way," she said.
Some, particularly those that have been quieter on the hiring front since March, might not have the same amount of comfort with virtual hiring.
"I'm not sold on idea that it won't go back to in person," Handwerker said. "I think it will depend just on how comfortable people got with Zoom. I think it will be firm by firm."
But it's possible that holdouts will be in the minority.
"There will be more virtual meetings than there were before. That's almost a certainty," Bodian predicted, adding that in-person meetings when individuals are in the same city will remain the norm.
Even still, Cummings—who called virtual interviews "80 to 90% as good" for getting a sense of a person—sees a role for them at single-office Warshaw Burstein, expecting many partners to work remotely with greater frequency even after a return to the workplace is possible.
"Virtual is just going to become an element of the recruiting process, just like it's an element of every other part of our practice."
For all the faults he finds in the virtual process, Braswell also sees no reason to abandon it, particularly when speed and cost considerations come to the foreground.
"Where time is imperative, you're going to resort to virtual. Where someone has more time, and you want to be able to weigh body language and other considerations, then you'll resort to the traditional way of doing things," he said. "I don't think we'll be going back to the old way of always having somebody come in."
|Read More
Buoyed by Recent Gains, Firms Embrace Opportunistic Hiring Amid Pandemic
Firms Keep California Dreamin' Even as Pandemic Rages
For Laterals, Integration Means Getting Familiar With New Colleagues' 'Natural Habitats'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250