Freshfields Won't Change Lockstep Model After All
The firm had been considering a performance-based acceleration mechanism, allowing junior partners to jump more quickly up the pay ladder.
July 30, 2020 at 05:40 AM
3 minute read
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer has decided against modifying its lockstep to a model that would have seen high-performing junior partners rise the ranks more quickly.
The firm had adjusted its partner compensation model in 2018 in an effort to retain star talent. But it had returned to the issue the following year in the wake of more partner departures.
In an interview with Law.com International in July managing partner Stephan Eilers said the firm is "happy and content" with the 2018 reforms to the lockstep and said: "We are not expecting further changes to our lockstep model."
The decision is likely to be a disappointment to some junior partners at the firm. The proposed "performance-based acceleration mechanism" in the system would have enabled them to double their salary to more than £2 million within just a few years.
One former Freshfields partner said that the firm probably felt it did not need to make further changes because it had already "ripped up the rule book on the lockstep" in 2018 when the firm first modified its system by introducing a gated system and putting top-earning partners into the 'superpoint' category.
The 2018 new single ladder scale enabled top performers to make six times more than those at the bottom, lengthening the points scale from 17.5 to 50, to 12 to 60 and adding in gates, in order to retain star talent. This increased the amount partners could earn at the very top of the lockstep from about £2.2 million to £3 million.
Eilers commented that the gate system "works well".
A London partner at the firm added that these changes have delivered "sufficient flexibility" to the partnership and that there has been no "recent noise" about reforming the model further, particularly as the upcoming management election begins to clarify the firm's ongoing agenda.
However, a London-based partner at a U.S. firm said that firms like Freshfields will continue to lose its younger talent unless changes to remuneration are made, as high performing people will be looking to move for more money.
He noted a source of discontent among junior partners will stem from "partners nearing retirement who basically take their foot off the accelerator".
"It's not that U.S. firms overpay", they said, "it's that they pay the fair amount of money for the work being brought in".
The current London Freshfields partner added that despite these changes not being anticipated currently, it may well pop back up on the radar.
"If you asked us whether we needed to change the model 10 years ago, we probably would have said no then too", they said. "But then 10 years later, we changed the model. Never say never."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTopping Big Law, Litigation Firm the Latest to Dole Out Above-Market Bonuses
3 minute readBoies Schiller Increases Federal Clerkship Bonus to $150K Amid Hiring Uptick
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 2Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 3Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 4Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
- 5Husch Blackwell, Foley Among Law Firms Opening Southeast Offices This Year
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250