Ooops! LSAT Scores Lost Amid Tech Failure
The Law School Admission Council says it has fixed a glitch that caused the answers of about 140 July LSAT takers to go missing.
July 30, 2020 at 05:01 PM
3 minute read
A glitch with the online version of the Law School Admission Test this month caused the answers of about 140 test takers to get lost, leaving them without a score.
The Law School Admission Council, which administers the LSAT, confirmed the problem Thursday, saying that a technical issue on the LSAT Flex—as the shorter online exam is known—prevented the answers from a "small number" of test takers from storing properly.
"We have tried multiple ways to recover the answers and are continuing to investigate the issue in hopes that we can recover answers and provide scores for at least some of the affected candidates," reads a prepared statement from the council.
The council said it is scheduling a free retake exam next week for those affected by the issue, with those scores being available in a week or less. The council is also refunding them the cost of the July exam and offering four free law school reports. (Applicants pay a fee to have their LSAT scores reported to individual schools.) A council spokeswoman said the problem impacted about 1% of the 14,000 people who took the LSAT Flex this month, or 140. It seems that about a sixth of the affected test takers are applying to law school this fall and need a score to do so.
"It appears that about 25 of those affected test takers had applied for admission this fall, and so we will work with them and the schools to which they've applied to ensure the schools are aware of this situation and will provide as much flexibility as possible given that the circumstances are not in any way the fault of the candidate," the council said.
Some of the LSAT takers whose answers were lost took to social media to vent their frustrations.
"Was looking forward to getting my July Flex score tomorrow (and being done with this test), but I just got a call from LSAC telling me they lost my data and can't give me a score," wrote one member of a Facebook group for people studying for the LSAT. "Did this happen to anyone else? I'm super frustrated."
It's not the first time that LSAT answers have gone missing, noted Steve Schwartz, the chief executive officer of test prep provider LSAT Unplugged. But those earlier incidents occurred when the LSAT was given on paper, and usually exam booklets from individual test centers were lost in the shipping process.
The council canceled the in-person March and April LSATs due to the COVID-19 pandemic and launched the LSAT Flex in May. The online test has been given each month since then and is scheduled to be administered in late August. The council said it's working to fix the glitch that led to the lost answers during July's test.
"This issue did not occur in the May and June tests," reads the council's statement. "We have made changes in our online testing platform to make sure this does not happen in the future."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFlorida Law Schools Are Seeing a Bump in Applications for 2025, After Recent Declines at Flagship Schools
3 minute readLaw School Applications are Up Across the Country. Law Deans Aren't Sure Why
6 minute readLibrarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250