Law Firms Keep Getting Cyberscammed; COVID's Impact on Salt Lake City's Unique Legal Market; How Trump's Dodging SCOTUS: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 03, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
CYBER INSECURITY - Add cyberthreats to the growing list of things to hate about COVID-19. As the pandemic pushed everyone to remote work, hackers and cyberscammers pounced. But one scheme, in particular, has been a problem for years and keeps ensnaring law firms of all sizes. "Spear-phishing" attacks—in which a target is induced to reveal confidential information or transfer money by a hacker impersonating, via email, someone the target knows—have bested everyone from a tiny suburban Pennsylvania firm to 10,000-plus-lawyer Dentons and, as recently reported by Dylan Jackson, 1,400-plus-lawyer Holland & Knight. In our latest Law.com Trendspotter column, we look at how and why this keeps happening, as well as how to prevent it from happening to you.
SALT LAKE STRUGGLES - There is a lot about Salt Lake City's legal market that is unique compared to its larger counterparts. For one thing, the largest firms by headcount are local ones. For another, there isn't much lateral movement between those firms. But as David Thomas reports, the city's law firms haven't escaped the pandemic-induced economic fallout that's impacted so many of their peers across the country. At least 23 firms based in Salt Lake City borrowed between $26.85 million and $64 million from the federal government in an effort to keep lawyers and staff on the payrolls at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to data released by the U.S. Small Business Administration. And even with the help of those loans, a number of firms said they've been forced to make salary cuts in order to keep people on their payrolls.
TRY, TRY AGAIN - Here's one for #MotivationMonday: Never let a U.S. Supreme Court ruling against you keep you from pursuing your dreams. It sure hasn't stopped President Donald Trump. As Jacqueline Thomsen writes in her latest Trump Watch briefing, POTUS has been hit with a string of SCOTUS losses, but he's still looked for…uh…creative ways to advance the key policies at the heart of those decisions anyway. From the census to DACA, Thomsen breaks down how Trump has sought to dodge adverse Supreme Court decisions with executive orders and memos.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
3 Young People Charged in Twitter Hack By Alaina Lancaster Justice Department Loses Bid to Decertify Immigration Judges' Union By Jacqueline Thomsen
Mobility 'Boot Camp' for the Home- and Desk-Bound Lawyer By Jonathan Jordan
You've Seen Hulu's 'Mrs. America' — Now Hear the Real Story By Vanessa Blum and Zack Needles
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
PROLONGED ATTACK - Just in case you were still skeptical of the cyberthreat facing law firms: Hannah Roberts reports Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky has unearthed an online group of hackers that it says has been targeting law firms for the best part of a decade. The group, called the Deceptikons APT, is also described by Kaspersky in a webinar briefing note as having targeted a set of European law firms last year with spearphishing attempts."In all likelihood," the briefing said, "the group's motivations included obtaining specific financial information, details of negotiations, and perhaps even evidence of the law firms' clientele."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
|"It isn't going to happen tomorrow. If you talk to five people who were there, they will all say this is a movement rather than a moment."
— Daniel Brown, litigation partner at Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton and chair of the firm's pro bono committee, explaining that the overall takeaway from the Law Firm Anti-Racism Alliance's first summit in Chicago last week was that the group's efforts will require detailed structure and organization.
➤➤ Sign up here to receive the Morning Minute straight to your inbox.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFederal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
2 minute readFinancial Watchdog Alleges Walmart Forced Army of Gig-Worker Drivers to Receive Pay Through High-Fee Accounts
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Alston & Bird Matches Market Rate for Associate Bonuses
- 2Commentary: Freedom's Just Another Word
- 3Former McCarter & English Associate Fired Over 'Gangsta Rap' LinkedIn Post Sues Over Discrimination, Retaliation
- 4First-of-Its-Kind Parkinson’s Patch at Center of Fight Over FDA Approval of Generic Version
- 5The end of the 'Rust' criminal case against Alec Baldwin may unlock a civil lawsuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250