Law Firms Struggle With Developing Talent From Afar; How to Whittle Down Your Outside Counsel List; Under Armour Sued for Citing COVID to Kill Contract: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
August 27, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
HOME ALONE – Working from home is working fine for many law firms—from a technical standpoint at least—but how to you keep remote lawyers from becoming alienated lawyers? As the pandemic wears on, firms are increasingly wrestling with how to train, coach and develop their talent in an effective and equitable manner, Patrick Smith reports. This is becoming especially complicated as segments of their workforce return to the office, while others remain remote for a variety of reasons. How do firms avoid falling into the trap of giving more work to the people who are physically present simply because it's more convenient? According to Mark Beese, president of Leadership for Lawyers, a consulting firm focused on training for leadership skills and business development in the legal industry, it's up to those in leadership positions to be deliberate about equitably allocating work. "The role of a leader is to create a culture and an environment where everyone is being developed," Beese said. "That is the definition of inclusion. If you are neglecting that leadership role, you might lose those people."
MAKING A LIST, CHECKING IT TWICE – As an in-house leader, whittling down your list of preferred outside counsel may sound like a major undertaking—and it definitely is—but just know that if General Motors could do it, anything is possible. According to Suzanne Miklos, GM's assistant general counsel and a recent panelist at the ILTA>ON virtual conference, the company narrowed its preferred provider list down from 900 law firms to only 19(!). How did they do it? If you guessed single-elimination breakdance competition—you're wrong, unfortunately. But as Frank Ready reports, what GM's legal department did do was build a task force comprised of one member from all of the different practice groups, who leveraged data to help redefine the scope of their outside counsel network along key parameters such as geographic location, expertise, diversity, hourly rates and the alignment of strategic goals.
UNDERHANDED UNDER ARMOUR? – Under Armour, the sportswear brand famous for a handful of NBA stars' signature shoes and also some very tight shirts, has been hit with a lawsuit by UCLA alleging the company used the pandemic as a convenient excuse to back out of the largest athletic apparel sponsorship deal in the history of American college sports. The complaint, filed yesterday by Kendall Brill & Kelly and the Regents of the University of California on behalf of the Department of Intercollegiate Athletics, alleges Under Armour breached its contract with the university "by fabricating a 'Force Majeure Event' and disingenuously citing the COVID-19 pandemic as a pretext for its purported termination of the Agreement." Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. Read the full complaint and stay up to date on major litigation nationwide with Law.com's Legal Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Always Braced for a Storm, These Louisiana Firms Knew How to Cope Amid COVID-19
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
BCLP Exploring Merger Prospects as Profitability Lags, Partnership Shrinks
Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
6 minute readDemocratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250