Virtual Civil Jury Trials Are Definitely Divisive—and Likely Inevitable; Law Firms Form Pandemic-Focused Practices; Office Reopening Software Sparks a Trademark Fight: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
September 14, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
JURY'S STILL OUT – In the July 27th edition of our Law.com Trendspotter column, we discussed how alternatives to in-person jury trials were gaining traction. At the time, along with nudging more litigants toward bench trials and traditional alternative dispute resolution methods, a number of courts were conducting experiments with virtual jury trials. Still, the vibe way back then (a month-and-a-half ago) was that most lawyers and judges were crossing their fingers that they wouldn't actually have to resort to conducting remote jury trials regularly. But now, a solid six months into the pandemic, trial-by-video-jury—at least in the civil context—is beginning to morph from experiment to expectation. And while lawyers aren't totally sold on the concept, a growing chorus of judges is making clear that it may be the only way to keep their dockets moving. In this week's Trendspotter column, we dig into why judges are increasingly pushing for virtual jury trials and why some lawyers are pushing back.
PANDEMIC PRACTICES – As the old saying goes: don't put all your eggs in one basket, or a global pandemic could come along and give all your eggs COVID-19. The importance of having a diversified client base, a well-rounded practice focus and the flexibility to pivot in response to changing economic forces has arguably never been more clear for law firms than it is right now. But it's not enough to just have those things—you need to be smart about how you use them. As Brenda Sapino Jeffreys reports, firms of all sizes are marketing ad hoc multidisciplinary practice groups to meet rapidly evolving pandemic-related client needs, a move aimed to boost demand even as the COVID-19 economic downturn takes a toll on revenue. Houston-based Chamberlain Hrdlicka White Williams & Aughtry, for example, has launched a Paycheck Protection Program Audits and Investigations Practice. Meanwhile, Pacific Northwest firm Lane Powell launched a COVID-19 Landlord/Tenant Response Team to help property owners and tenants understand their obligations and rights. "It's really smart for firms to try to do this in response [to COVID-19 issues] so they can frankly provide better service and smarter service to their clients. The challenge is they have to be super-aggressive and very creative in getting the word out,"said Deborah McMurray, founder and CEO of Content Pilot in Dallas.
NAME BLAME GAME – We may have just discovered a new strain of pandemic-related litigation: trademark disputes over office-reopening software. McGuireWoods filed a trademark lawsuit Friday in California Northern District Court on behalf of TIBCO Software. The suit seeks a declaratory judgment that TIBCO's new GatherSmart platform, designed to help companies manage the return to the office following COVID-19, does not infringe trademark rights of the defendant, GatherSmart LLC. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. Read the full complaint and stay up to date on major litigation nationwide with Law.com's Legal Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
10 minute readPolicy Wonks' Obsession: What Will Tuesday's Election Mean for FTC Firebrand Khan?
6 minute readAI Gives Legal Departments New Leverage to Demand Speed, Efficiency From Law Firms
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250