Mobile App Fraud: How to Create Enforcement Strategies for App Stores
US adults spend on average more than 4 hours a day on the mobile internet, with 88% of that time spent engaging with apps.
September 15, 2020 at 12:12 AM
3 minute read
Cost: Complimentary
Sponsored by:
ON DEMAND
This event is available for on-demand viewing. If you have previously registered click here to login using the email you registered with.
US adults spend on average more than 4 hours a day on the mobile internet, with 88% of that time spent engaging with apps. In the first quarter of 2020, consumers spent over $23.4 billion via app stores, the highest quarter ever reported.
Unfortunately, bad actors have been quick to recognize these trends and have adapted their tactics to take advantage of the popularity of mobile apps. Dark Reading reports that rogue mobile apps and brand abuse due to social media impersonation accounted for 37% of all fraudulent transactions recorded in Q1 2020.
In the second of a 3-part series, this webcast will focus on specific enforcement tactics and strategies for the major app stores as well as how to create enforcement strategies for the hundreds of third-party app stores, each of which has its own policies and procedures. Attendees will gain:
- A thorough understanding of how to construct an effective enforcement strategy for mobile app infringement, including how to prepare for success.
- Specific measures needed for successful enforcement in the major app stores.
- A framework for approaching the wide variety of requirements in the popular third party app ecosystem.
REGISTER NOW! (Not able to attend? STILL REGISTER you will receive an email with how to access the recording of the event)
Speakers:
 | Alexis Meghrouni | Director Enforcement Strategies and Services | Appdetex Alexis Meghrouni has 18 years in online intellectual property protection for some of the world's largest corporations. Alexis is a member of the California Bar and practiced law in Southern California prior to her work in the field of online intellectual property protection. |
 | Frederick Felman | CMO | Appdetex Frederick Felman brings 30 years of success in product and marketing roles at high-growth private and public companies to AppDetex. He has extensive experience in branding and leading global marketing strategies and is an active participant in internet policy development in the ICANN community. Fred served as the CMO of MarkMonitor before its acquisition by Thomson Reuters. |
or call at (212) 457-4981
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Groen Strokoff O'Neill, LLC adds accomplished Trial Lawyer, William "Bill" Coppol.
1 minute readCushman Benchmark Survey (the “Sweepstakes”) Official Terms and Conditions
7 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1When Dealing With Child Abuse Cases, Attorneys Need to Know How Children Perceive Time
- 2Like a Life Raft: Ben Brafman Reflects on Nearly 50 Years as a Defense Attorney
- 3HSF Partner Removed Over ‘Deeply Offensive’ Tweets
- 4Another Latham Partner Heads to Sidley in London
- 5In 'Kousisis,' the DOJ Once Again Pushes the Limits of Federal Fraud Prosecutions
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
