Census Bureau data highlights trends in health insurance coverage
Though specific numbers may be inaccurate due to coronavirus-related collection issues, there are still some notable takeaways.
September 16, 2020 at 09:08 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
While 2020 has been a year of chaos, new data from the U.S. Census Bureau at least offers a clear view of how health insurance access had been progressing up until the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Notably, between 2018 and 2019, Medicare coverage decreased, employer-sponsored coverage increased (maybe), and the overall uninsured rate decreased. (Click through the slides above to take a closer look at the numbers) More specifically, according to the latest data, 92% of people had health insurance for all or part of 2019, and 55.4% were covered by an employer-sponsored health plan. In 2018, 55.2% were covered. Though this appears to be a small increase, the Bureau noted that a lower response rate during this year's collection period (March and April) than in past years that could impact the accuracy of the latest figures. Related: COVID-19 and the uninsured rate: What's the deal? "Given the circumstances during CPS ASEC data collection, we cannot disentangle real changes in health insurance coverage between 2018 and 2019 from changes due to operational adaptations due to the pandemic," study authors noted. In fact, the results of the survey could point to a trend in coverage: While overall 92% of people reported having health insurance coverage at some point during 2019, just 90.8% said they were insured at the time of the interview. The uninsured rate rose in 2019 for 19 states, with just one state noting a decrease. Massachusetts continues to boast the lowest uninsured rate at just 3%, followed by Rhode Island, Hawaii and Vermont. Texas fell farther behind in 2019, with an uninsured rate of 18.4%. Census data also continues to support the correlation between Medicaid expansion and a lower uninsured rate. Census authors also note that the timing of the studies used to gather data have also muddied the results, with one set of information showing a 0.3% increase in the uninsured rate and the other showing a 0.4% decrease. "Higher employment in the latter part of the year may not be reflected in coverage estimates at time of interview, but may be captured by measures of any coverage in the previous calendar year," the authors note. "At the same time, the operational changes to data collection required due to the COVID-19 pandemic may also have contributed to higher estimates of employer-provided coverage." Private health insurance--either through an employer or individual plan--is still the most common option, covering 68% of people at some point during the year, compared to 34.1% enrolled in a public program. While Medicaid coverage showed a drop of 0.7% (possibly due to the previously noted collection issues), more recent studies have pointed to a significant increase--by as much as 7% to 11% between February and August. Insurance coverage also varies according to demographics such as age and race. Children under age 19 and adults over the age of 65 are more likely to be insured due to the availability of public programs such as Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program. According to Census data, just 1.1% of older adults were uninsured for the entire 2019 year, as well as just 5.2% of children. Among different ethnicities, the uninsured rate is highest for Hispanics (16.7%) and Blacks (9.6%). While the specific numbers may be called into question, the latest data continues to highlight the overall trends in health care coverage, including inequities caused by race and income level. These disparities have only increased as a result of the pandemic and economic instability. Read more: |
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 2Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 3For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 4As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
- 5General Warrants and ESI
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250