Law Firms Face a Wild Budgeting Season; Class Actions Over Remote Classes Gain Steam; Allele Files Patent Suit Over COVID-19 Vaccine Trials: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
October 06, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
BUDGETING WITHOUT A BASELINE – How do you set a budget following the weirdest year ever—especially when next year is fixing to be pretty weird too? That's the question law firm leaders are asking themselves right now as they try to plan for a 2021 that may or may not include costs for things like business travel and in-person client development activities that were basically wiped out in 2020. Add to that the uncertainty of the upcoming presidential election and the need for continued (and maybe even increased) investment in technology and you've got quite a puzzle. The only logical solution may be multiple potential solutions. "We're preparing various scenarios that range anywhere from back to normal immediately to another similar year, and multiple things in between," Haynes & Boone managing partner Tim Powers told Dan Packel.
CLASS IS IN SESSION – Maybe you can put a price on the college experience after all. Proposed class actions file by students against colleges and universities, seeking refunds for tuition and fees paid during the first COVID-19 lockdowns, have been given the green light by judges in more than a half-dozen cases, reports Amanda Bronstad. About 200 class actions hit the courts soon after campuses closed this spring, most asserting breach of contract and unjust enrichment on behalf of various classes of students seeking refunds for tuition, fees, and housing and meal costs. But how far will these claims ultimately get? Peter Lake, a professor at Stetson University College of Law in Gulfport, Florida, told Bronstad he foresees a number of defendants quietly settling these cases to avoid an uncertain fate in court. "I would have told you 15 years ago these claims have no chance, but today I can't be that predictive—you may see some judges who think, well, promises were made and representations made, there's some contract," he said. "My guess is somewhere, someplace, some judges are going to evolve claims against institutions in ways that wouldn't have been obvious 10 to 15 years ago."
VEXING VACCINE – Allele Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals and its lawyers at Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders hit Pfizer, BioNTech and other defendants with a lawsuit yesterday in California Southern District Court over the companies' ongoing efforts to develop a COVID-19 vaccine. Allele accuses the defendants of infringing on its patented technology to develop the vaccine. The dispute centers on Allele's mNeonGreen product, which the complaint describes as "a fluorescent protein used as a biological tag in genetic engineering work." "mNeonGreen was the critical link in Defendants' COVID-19 vaccine development and its continued trial success," the complaint says, adding, "While Defendants were required to obtain a commercial license from Allele, Defendants never sought a license with Allele or even contacted them." Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. Stay up to date on major litigation nationwide with Law.com's Legal Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
On Opening Day, Ginsburg Is Honored and Two Justices Renew Attack on Same-Sex Marriage
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
8 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Insurer Not Required to Cover $29M Wrongful Death Judgment, Appeals Court Rules
- 2Slideshow: Jewish Bar Association of Georgia Marks 1st Year With Hanukkah Party
- 3Holland & Knight Launches Export Control Disputes and Advocacy Team
- 4Blake Lively's claims that movie co-star launched smear campaign gets support in publicist's suit
- 5Middle District of Pennsylvania's U.S. Attorney Announces Resignation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250