Firms' Future Remote Plans, Internal ALSPs' Popularity, Big Law AG Practices: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
October 23, 2020 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
OFFICES ARE OVERRATED - Even though COVID-19 is still spreading around the globe, some law firms are mapping out their post-pandemic work arrangements. As part of its "Work Smart Plus" policy, DLA Piper has moved to allow its non-U.S. employees—including partners—to work two days per week away from the office, subject to their manager's approval, Simon Lock reports. The updated policy, which took into account lessons learned from the pandemic, won't come into effect until after the health crisis subsides. DLA Piper, however, isn't the only firm that's settled on its remote work future. In August, Linklaters enacted a policy allowing all its global employees to work remotely for up to 20-50% of their time. Many other firms, such as Slaughter and May and Davis Wright Tremaine are currently reviewing their flexible work policies as well.
FIRMS' ALSP MOMENT? – As the pandemic forces corporate legal departments to do even more with less, law firms' internal alternative legal services providers (ALSPs) are becoming more popular. Womble Bond Dickinson's GC Solutions, a contract attorney service started three years ago that offers uniform hourly rates and alternative fee arrangements specifically for corporate work, has seen billings increase 11% since March, and revenue jump 33% year over year, Meredith Hobbs reports. Jamie Francis, the Womble corporate partner who leads GC Solutions, said there's been higher demand for the ALSP to handle large internal corporate projects that budget-constrained legal departments don't have the capacity to take on themselves. While firm ALSPs are not common across the industry, a recent report found that at least 35 such entities exist among the AmLaw 100.
BIG LAW AG BUSINESS - With the Trump Administration reining in federal enforcement actions, state attorneys general have stepped up to fill the void—and many in Big Law have taken note. Once a niche area, state attorney general practices are increasingly becoming a staple for many large U.S. law firms, Dylan Jackson reports. The proliferation of these practices is also likely to continue no matter who wins the White House this November. While state attorneys general have recently become more active and emboldened, their strength and visibility have been steadily growing over the past two decades. Still, lawyers caution that the demands of a state attorney general practice are unique and can't just be met by regulatory, commercial litigation or antitrust attorneys.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
New Program Calls On Managing Partners, General Counsel to Make 'Personal Commitments' to Diversity
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom 'Confusing Labyrinth' to Speeding 'Roller Coaster': Uncertainty Reigns in Title IX as Litigators Await Second Trump Admin
6 minute readNew Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250