Courts Face a Troublesome Trio of COVID-19 Problems; New Law Is Big Law's Next Global Threat; Teva Shareholders Sue Over Generic Drug Price Hikes: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start the day.
October 30, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
BUDGET CUTS, BACKLOGS AND BACKLASH - Add court administrators to the long list of people who are having a crappy time during the pandemic. As state judiciaries across the country struggle with the logistical—and, in some instances, constitutional—challenges associated with both remote and in-person proceedings, they're also dealing with slashed budgets, growing case backlogs and criticism from attorneys eager to get back to some semblance of business as usual. In our latest Law.com Litigation Trendspotter column, we look at how that trio of intertwined challenges—while not completely new—is being exacerbated by COVID-19, and why things might get worse before they get better.
A WHOLE NEW WORLD - At the risk of getting too cheeky with the wordplay, I suppose one might describe New Law firms and alternative legal service providers as quite literally a growing threat to Big Law! (You know, because they're physically growing in size and geographic reach?) But seriously folks, as Zach Warren writes in this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, the globalization of New Law is accelerating, even during a global economic downswing. Markets that were previously the purview of only the largest law firms are beginning to see competition that isn't only local firms, but also fellow multinational firms presenting alternative structures. It represents a new battleground for a business development fight that has largely been waged in the past decade in the U.S. and U.K. To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.
DRUG BUST - Teva Pharmaceutical Industries was sued Thursday in Connecticut District Court over allegations that the company's years-long strategy of increasing prices for generic drugs defrauded investors. "This is an action to recover significant investment losses suffered as a result of a massive fraud that led investors to believe that Teva–the world's largest generic drug manufacturer–was experiencing strong financial growth over a number of years based on fundamentally sound business practices when, in fact, Teva's performance was being driven by an illegal practice of colluding with other drug manufacturers to systematically increase the price of scores of generic drugs," the complaint alleges. The court action was brought by Cohen & Wolf and Rolnick Kramer Sadighi on behalf of a group of investment funds. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. Stay up to date on major litigation nationwide with Law.com's Legal Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates
4 minute readDissenter Blasts 4th Circuit Majority Decision Upholding Meta's Section 230 Defense
5 minute readFrom Laggards to Tech Founders: Law Firm Innovation Is Flourishing
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Always Be Willing to Work Harder Than the Person Next to You,' Says Esther Cho of Stradley Ronon
- 2People in the News—Feb. 10, 2025—Flaster Greenberg, Tucker Arensberg
- 3The Support Center for Child Advocates Welcomes New Executive Director
- 4'Shame on Us': Lawyer Hits Hard After Judge's Suicide
- 5Upholding the Integrity of the Rule of Law Amid Trump 2.0
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250