Introducing the New Law.com Radar: Fast Updates Personalized to Your Practice
Legal Radar is now Law.com Radar with all-new coverage of the latest corporate transactions.
November 09, 2020 at 10:41 AM
2 minute read
ALM Media and Law.com are excited to announce the launch of Law.com Radar and the introduction of real-time reporting on corporate deal legal work.
Law.com Radar offers a new way to track legal developments involving key clients or industry segments. What makes Radar unique is its high-speed approach—delivering updates hours ahead of other providers—and the ability for subscribers to personalize their news feeds to access the information that's most relevant.
With today's launch, subscribers can easily stay on the forefront of what is driving the litigation and deals impacting key clients or industry segments so they stay informed for their own practice, for their clients, and to understand the competitive landscape.
Radar applies cutting-edge technology and editorial expertise to deliver immediate updates on new litigation in the federal courts and what law firms are handling big matters. The new corporate deal coverage includes updates on the latest mergers and acquisitions, private equity deals, securities offerings, venture financings, real estate transactions and other corporate transactions in the U.S. and globally.
Here's what else you need to know about the new Law.com Radar.
➤ New name: Legal Radar is now Law.com Radar.
➤ Expanded coverage: Law.com Radar includes the ability to track legal developments across 33 industries, 20 practice areas and topics, all U.S. states and global regions. Plus thousands of companies and law firms.
➤ More options: Law.com Radar now offers two versions, a free version and a new Premium version with exclusive corporate deal coverage and more customization options.
➤ Law.com subscriber access: As a Law.com subscriber you already have full access to the Premium level of Law.com Radar. Enjoy!
➤ Get started: Set up your custom Radar feed today at law.com/radar
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Students From Six Law Schools Develop New Legal Tech Ideas in Liberty Mutual's Legal Design Challenge
Troubles Mount for Juul as 34 States Join Investigation of E-Cigarette Company
4 minute read
Microsoft Unveils New Information Governance Tools as Regulatory Demands Grow
4 minute read
<i>Case Study:</i> How Momkus McCluskey Virtualized Its IT for Better Security and Productivity
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
