GCs Want Firms to Pick Up the Phone | Law Firm Subsidiaries End 2020 With a Bang | Folger Hit With Class Action Over Coffee Packaging: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
December 02, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
CALL ME MAYBE - From webinars and podcasts to Zoom meetings and text messages, the pandemic has shown us that there are a million and one ways to connect with current and prospective clients in 2020. But when you really want to get the message across, a simple phone call still works best, according to a new survey of general counsel, conducted jointly by strategic communications firm Greentarget and legal consulting firm Zeughauser Group. As Patrick Smith reports, the survey, conducted over several months from the beginning of the pandemic in March through August, found that the number one way GCs prefer to be contacted by outside counsel is with a personal phone call—provided, of course, that the call is relaying information that's relevant, timely, novel and useful.
PROUD PARENTS - A number of law firms' subsidiaries hit a rough patch in their growth and development during the early months of the pandemic, only to rebound in a big way. Now, they're heading into 2021 with high hopes, Dan Packel reports. Captives focused on e-discovery, alternative staffing and automated legal expertise all saw a demand dropoff at first but are now poised to finish out 2020 as their best year ever, which could be a sign that other firms should consider spawning subsidiaries of their own. "We think there's great opportunity for the right firms to go down this pathway," said Baretz+Brunelle New Law practice co-head Beatrice Seravello. "It ends up being a very profitable revenue stream for firms if they make the commitment."
THE WORST PART OF WAKING UP - Counting how many cups of coffee you're consuming while working from home during a pandemic is probably not going to make you feel better about life. Still, no one likes to be short-changed. The Folger Coffee Co. and its corporate parent, J.M. Smucker, were hit with a consumer class action Monday in Illinois Northern District Court over the labeling of ground coffee products. The suit, filed by Carlson Lynch, alleges that Folgers Coffee packaging exaggerates the number of cups that can be brewed from the contents. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:20-cv-07074, Moser v. The J. M. Smucker Company. Stay up on the latest litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
After Shutting USAID, Trump Eyes Department of Education, CFPB
'A Shock to the System’: Some Government Attorneys Are Forced Out, While Others Weigh Job Options
7 minute readGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250