More Law Firm Leaders Mull Remote Hires | Orange County Courthouse Begins Contact Tracing | A Dispute Over COVID-19 Help for Black Business Owners: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
December 14, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
LET'S NOT GET PHYSICAL - Once upon a time, when a law firm said it was establishing a "presence" in a city or region, it meant it was opening or acquiring a brick-and-mortar office, staffed with local attorneys. But in recent months, more and more law firms have begun to realize that expanding their reach doesn't necessarily have to mean growing their rent bill. In this week's Law.com Trendspotter column, we look at why traditional law firm leaders are increasingly coming around to a concept distributed law firm leaders have been hip to for a while now: you can add talent without adding physical office space. And, in fact, you can attract talent by substracting that real estate overhead.
WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN? - Starting today, Law.com's Cheryl Miller reports, lawyers visiting Orange County, California, courthouses must comply with a novel new COVID-19 contact tracing program that will collect their names and contact information when they enter a courtroom. Orange County Superior Court Presiding Judge Kirk Nakamura issued an administrative order late last week mandating that lawyers scan QR, or quick response, codes posted outside each courtroom with their cellphones. Lawyers without a QR scanner will be asked instead to fill out a web-based form that questions what courthouse they visited, when and what agency or law firm they work for. "This will ensure that if a positive case of COVID-19 is detected in an individual present at a court proceeding at the Orange County Superior Court, the court will be able to identify, inform, and support the other individuals who may have been exposed to the individual diagnosed with COVID-19," the order said.
BIASED BAILOUT? - Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt shareholder Amanda Gamblin has stepped in to represent the Black United Fund of Oregon and The Contingent in a class action that challenges an Oregon grant program established to help Black individuals and business owners affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The suit, filed October 29 in Oregon District Court by Benbrook Law Group, Mitchell Law, and Murphy & Buchal, contends that program's consideration of race is unconstitutional. A Snell & Wilmer team is representing the Oregon Department of Administrative Services in 3:20-cv-01866, Great Northern Resources, Inc. v. Coba et al. Stay up on the latest litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
'Business as Usual Doesn't Work': Inside Big Law's Reckoning on Race
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250