Partner Pay Expectations Rebound | Why Legal Tech Still Needs Offices | Cooley Defending Google in Data Depletion Class Action: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
December 28, 2020 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
YOU'RE GONNA MAKE IT AFTER ALL - Maybe the rusted carnival ride that is 2020 won't spin off its axis and into the lake after all—at least not for the legal industry. When polled earlier this year, a majority of law firm partners told Major, Lindsey & Africa they expected their 2020 compensation to take a hit. But, as Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports, a more recent, albeit smaller, survey by the consultancy found a decidedly sunnier outlook among respondents. After the release of its initial report, Major Lindsey conducted a flash survey in November to account for the fact that law firms were "faring far better than anyone expected." Two-thirds of the 134 respondents said they did not expect their compensation to be cut (more than 1,200 partners answered the first survey between July and September). About 43% of November respondents said their firm had fully reversed pay cuts, while 41% said their firm partially rolled back cuts.
RETURN TO SPACE - You might think legal tech companies would be uniquely well-equipped to thrive in a full-time remote working environment, but it turns out they're missing the comforting glide of office chair wheels on commercial grade carpeting as much as anyone. Those companies, like law firms, are mulling downsizing their space and ramping up their work-from-home policies, but, as Law.com's Frank Ready reports, many are still not prepared to wave goodbye to physical offices altogether. "I think there's a reason that we all like to collaborate in person. There's something that we miss when we are all remote. And whether that's truly a business requirement or just a quality of life type, I think that over the next couple of years that firms are going to retrench and then start coming back [to an office]," said Eli Nussbaum, managing director and director of business development at managed services provider Keno Kozie Associates.
IN DEFENSE OF DATA DEPLETION - Cooley partner Whitty Somvichian and associates Max Bernstein and Kelsey R. Spector have stepped in to defend Google in a pending class action on behalf of Android users. The suit, filed November 12 in in California Northern District Court by Korein Tillery, Bartlit Beck and McManis Faulkner, contends that Google depletes its users' cellular data through near constant collection and transmission of user data. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. Demarchi, is 5:20-cv-07956, Taylor et al v. Google LLC. Stay up on the latest litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Inside the 'Zoom Room': How Texas Trial Firms Went Virtual, and What May Stick By Brenda Sapino Jeffreys Readers' Poll Results: This Year, the Holidays Are Harder Than Ever By Law.com Contributing Editors Ahead of the Curve: The 2020 Legal Education Year In Review By Karen Sloan Trump Pardons More Friends, Allies as White House Term Nears End By C. Ryan Barber The Less-is-More Approach to Business Development for Young Lawyers By Jay Harrington|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
STAYING POSITIVE - COVID-19 hasn't devastated the Middle East and Africa quite as it has much of the rest of the world, but it did heap yet another challenge on nations that had already faced major problems, including war, famine, sectarian tension, major political upheaval and economic malaise amid plummeting commodities and oil prices. However, beginning long before the pandemic struck, both regions enjoyed steady gains in business, infrastructure, and law, which is becoming ever progressive and globalized. And, as Law.com International's Jennigay Coetzer, Peter Shaw-Smith and Krishnan Nair report, law firms, though facing their own issues and staff cuts, rode a wave of unwavering hope and optimism this year.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"If the goal here is increasing access to legal services, not being bold is basically the same thing as putting a Band-Aid on a broken leg."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250