Tax Lawyers Gear Up for Big Year | Why Big Tech Should Brace Itself | Lawsuit Targets Purported COVID-Relieving Cough Syrup: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 04, 2021 at 06:20 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
TURBO TAX - Happy New Year! Let's pretend 2020 was a nightmare brought on by some bad gas station sushi and look ahead to the rest of this year instead, shall we? For example, tax lawyers are gearing up for a busy 12 months, as corporate clients continue to work through the sweeping changes from the Trump administration's 2017 tax reform legislation and the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic forces cash-strapped states to seek new revenue sources, including tax increases, while federal and state tax authorities step up enforcement, Law.com's Meredith Hobbs reports. "We are telling our clients to expect new taxes, increases to existing taxes and heightened enforcement," said Jeff Friedman, head of Eversheds Sutherland's tax practice. He forecasts "one of the busiest legislative sessions ever for states on tax increases. We expect every state and locality to reconsider their taxing structure and consider additional sources of revenue."
TRUSTED ADVISORS - This year, tech companies would be wise to line up some trusted pros when it comes to antitrust (see what I did there?). Experts expect that a Democratic presidential administration led by President-elect Joe Biden will bring a new intensity to the antitrust space, particularly when it comes to the tech industry, Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports. Barry Nigro, who left the DOJ antitrust division as second-in-command to rejoin Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson in November, said Democrats' interest in going "beyond the consumer welfare standard" will lead to a pronounced change in antitrust efforts. Meanwhile, increased federal action is likely to bring more lawsuits from the plaintiffs bar, according to Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison partner Bill Isaacson, who regularly defends tech companies in antitrust actions. "You're seeing the beginnings of it this year, and it is certainly going to grow," Isaacson said.
BAD MEDICINE - Emergent BioSolutions, a Maryland-based drugmaker working to develop COVID-19 vaccines, sued Mutual Holistic on Dec. 30 in California Northern District Court over trademark claims. The lawsuit was brought by Crowell & Moring and Brinks Gilson & Lione, and alleges that the defendant is using Emergent's mark in marketing a cough syrup aimed at alleviating COVID-19 symptoms. Lawyers have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 5:20-cv-09452, Emergent BioSolutions Inc. v. Mutual Holistic, Inc. Stay up on the latest litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
2021 Forecast: A Difficult Year Is Giving Way to Hope and Clarity for Health Care Clients By Dan Roe In Virus Era, US Supreme Court Filings Fell 16% Year-Over-Year By Mike Scarcella Split Duties: Firms Large and Small Transitioned to Multi-Attorney Leadership in 2020 By Dylan Jackson A Difficult Year: The Cyberattacks That Pervaded the Legal Industry in 2020 By Victoria Hudgins Gone but Not Forgotten: The Law Firm Names You Won't See in 2021 By Dan Roe|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
GOOD FOR BUSINESS - In landmark reforms to the United Arab Emirates' foreign direct investment (FDI) framework, the requirement for onshore companies to be owned 51% by UAE nationals has been scrapped, in amendments to a raft of laws due to come into effect on January 2, 2021. That's good news for corporate lawyers in the region, Law.com International's Peter Shaw-Smith reports. "We've been inundated with calls and emails from current and potential clients asking us about this. The reception is very positive in the business community," said Rodolphe Pellerin, national partner of Dechert in the UAE. "There's clearly been a push by the authorities to attract foreign investors, foreign players. This is, if you will, the last piece of the puzzle."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"I think my biggest accomplishment this year was making it through."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
4 minute read'Appropriate Relief'?: Google Offers Remedy Concessions in DOJ Antitrust Fight
4 minute readLife, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
8 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 2Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 3Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 4Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
- 5Georgia Supreme Court Honoring Troutman Pepper Partner, Former Chief Justice
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250