Profitability's Growing Role in Partner Comp | How the Pandemic Might Help Improve Diversity | North Face Hit With Trademark Suit: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 13, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
WORKING THE MARGINS - Pop quiz, hotshot: How do you calculate the value of a partner's practice? If you said, "Based on the revenue it brings in," thanks for playing—but no. Well, at least not anymore. As Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, law firms are increasingly focusing on profitability when setting and evaluating partner compensation, which means taking a hard look at metrics like realization rates, frequency of discounts and the degree of leverage. "I can tell you it was always a frustration among the managing partners that we dealt with—some of the very successful partners didn't care about what their book was and what profitability was. In their minds, they had a $10 million practice, and they wanted to be compensated as such," said Jeffrey Lowe, global practice leader for Major Lindsey & Africa's law firm practice. "And management finally learned how to go back to them and say, 'Yeah, it's a $10 million practice, but it costs us $8 million to service."
POST-PANDEMIC PROGRESS - In-house experts say that, in the wake of the killings of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor last year, they've seen a greater push for diversity and inclusion in legal departments and their outside counsel. And, as they told Law.com's Dan Clark, they expect that momentum to continue in 2021, with some help from the incoming presidential administration and, interestingly, the pandemic. President-elect Joe Biden is expected to reverse an executive order President Donald Trump issued last year banning diversity training. Meanwhile, the rise of remote work over the past year has removed one of the main excuses corporations and law firms have long relied upon to cover for their diversity deficiencies: that they couldn't find qualified candidates in certain areas of the country. "People can do their work from a variety of different locations and you don't need to be clustered in or around a metropolis in order to contribute at a professional level," said Veta Richardson, president and CEO of the Association of Corporate Counsel.
L'EGGO MY LOGO - North Face Apparel and VF Corp. were slapped with a trademark lawsuit Tuesday in California Central District Court. The court case was filed by Erikson Law Group on behalf of Leonard McGurr, a well-known street artist who goes by the name "Futura." The suit alleges that North Face is invoking McGurr's artwork by using a copy of the artist's characteristic atom design as the logo for a new line of North Face apparel. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 2:21-cv-00269, McGurr v. The North Face Apparel Corp. et al. Stay up on the latest deals with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Boies Schiller's Young Lawyer Ranks Are Shrinking By Dylan Jackson Amid FBI Warnings, Courthouses Weigh Security Before Inauguration Day By Angela Morris Big Law Will See Lasting Changes in Budgets and Remote Work After 2020 By Andrew Maloney Observers Worry the Planned Bar Exam Revamp Won't Go Far Enough By Karen Sloan Big Law Firms Join In PAC-Freezing Following Capitol Attack By Patrick Smith|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
A WIN FOR QUINN - Count Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan's London office among those that ended 2020 on a higher note than expected given the amount of turmoil the legal industry dealt with last year. The office saw a 27% surge in its revenue for 2020, while profits jumped 34%, according to the firm's latest financial results, Law.com International's Krishnan Nair reports. The firm's London senior partner Richard East said in a statement: "Given the worldwide pandemic, the resultant economic dislocation and the entire office transitioning to working from home in March, these results are truly astounding. They derive from the total commitment to the service of our clients that has been shown by our London workforce."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"I never signed onto this, I never looked for this, I never wanted to be any part of this. This was my courtesy being extended to someone who already was a client."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
'Serious Disruptions'?: Federal Courts Brace for Government Shutdown Threat
3 minute read'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250