Will Associates Have Their Revenge? | Legal Tech Hiring Gets Ultracompetitive | Credit Karma Hit With ADA Compliance Suit: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 27, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
REVENGE OF THE ASSOCIATES - As we've mentioned plenty of times before in this space, 2020 put associates through the wringer, as many of them endured pay cuts while partners bogarted their work and their professional development stagnated. But when things start looking up again, they aren't likely to forget how they were treated by their firms when the going got tough. And, as Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports, law firm leaders are now bracing for the backlash that could come once the pandemic begins to subside, more opportunities start to open up and associates once again feel like they can take control of their professional lives. "People are rethinking their priorities," McGuireWoods managing partner Tracy Walker said. "There's probably a lot of built-up angst. Once that pressure is relieved with a light at the end of the tunnel, as we get into the middle of [2021], I think a lot of associates will think, 'What should I do for my career?'"
TECH CROWD - For a lot of legal tech companies, the realization that, through the magic of remote work, they can now hire outside of their existing geographic footprints without having to take on the overhead of a brick-and-mortar office is a game-changer. And that's the problem: the game is changing for everybody, and there can be no strategic advantage when everyone has the same strategy. As Law.com's Frank Ready reports, the expansion to a national—and, in some cases, even global—talent pool will likely mean increased competition for employees and employers alike. And while that's unlikely to deter legal tech companies from remote hiring, it does mean they're going to have to look for any competitive edge they can find. For example, as Jared Coseglia, founder and CEO of Tru Staffing Partners, told Ready: "The speed at which you move on talent when you want them will be, in my opinion, the No. 1 differentiator among employers."
BAD KARMA? - Consumer finance platform Credit Karma was sued Tuesday in New York Eastern District Court over the ADA compliance of its mobile app. The lawsuit, brought by Shaked Law Group, contends that the Credit Karma app denies full access to blind and visually-impaired individuals. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:21-cv-00422, Crosson v. Credit Karma Inc. Stay up on the latest deals with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Tea and Empathy at Big Law By Vivia Chen
Sarah Harrington Eyed for DOJ Head of Civil Appellate Staff By Marcia Coyle Joy Reid Asks Court to Toss Lin Wood from NY Defamation Suit, Citing Baseless Attacks on Election By Tom McParland Why Is Legal Department Transformation Falling Short? By Dan ClarkAhead of the Curve: A Multi-Pronged Approach to Diversity and Inclusion By Karen Sloan
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
CREDIT LIMIT? – The recent introduction of a billable hour credit for diversity and inclusion work by Hogan Lovells earned plenty of kudos. The firm announced that up to 50 hours of diversity efforts undertaken by U.S. lawyers will count towards the target of 1,850 billable hours, at which point pro bono hours can be included in a bonus assessment. But, as Law.com International's Varsha Patel reports, not everyone agrees that lawyers should get pro bono credit for their D&I efforts, arguing that the latter threatens to diminish the former. Bill Skirrow, executive director of U.K.-based Pro Bono Community, for example, said that "perhaps D&I should come under the definition of corporate responsibility and not pro bono" and that he would prefer a "cleaner and slightly narrower focus on pro bono." "That would fit our perspective and I'd prefer to see law firms acknowledging that, if they are allocating resources to D&I, then it should not be at the expense of pro bono," Skirrow said.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"If the standard is that because people will get upset, we shouldn't do something. Well, there are a lot of things in this country and things in the world where people got upset. But you do what is right because it is right."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firm Diversity Pros Fear for Future of DEI Efforts Under Trump Presidency
The Reason a GC Abruptly Departs May Not Be What You Think
Big Law Lawyers Fan Out for Election Day Volunteering in Call Centers and Litigation
7 minute readElection Outcome Could Spur Policy U-Turns Across Employment Landscape
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250