The Danger of Superstar Laterals | Why Didn't Law Firm Partner Classes Shrink? | Pharma Company Claims COVID Helped Spread Misinformation: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
January 28, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
RAINMAKING ON YOUR PARADE - Hiring hotshot laterals who command stratospheric pay is an increasingly common tactic for ambitious Am Law 200 firms. But as the classic song goes, when you wish upon a star—sometimes that star turns around and leaves with their giant book of business after just a couple of years. Take, for example, Jim Woolery, a highly connected New York dealmaker who joined Atlanta-based King & Spalding in May 2017, only to roll out last fall so he could start his own boutique. As Law.com's Meredith Hobbs reports, landing a big-name rainmaker can lead to a huge payoff, but an early exit can make it more difficult for a firm to convince the rest of its partnership to hire other marquee names. Still, that doesn't mean firms should stop trying—it just means they need to take steps to increase the odds that the next big hire will stick.
CLASS ACT? - After last year's white-knuckle ride for the legal industry, there was some speculation that Big Law partner classes might shrink, with firms perhaps being cautious about diluting their 2020 partner profits. Instead, new partner class sizes have mostly remained static, Law.com's Patrick Smith reports. But why? Bruce MacEwan and Janet Stanton of legal consulting firm Adam Smith, Esquire, posited that some firms might have maintained their class sizes (and sacrificed PEP) in order to try to project strength to the market. But that's just one theory. The consultants also noted that some firms may have been seeking to avoid a talent gap in the future like the one so many firms experienced after the Great Recession. Still, they added, holding steady on partner promotions may have been the result of an even simpler calculation: more partners = more partner billables.
ILL COMMUNICATION - Locke Lord and Nexsen Pruet filed a lawsuit Wednesday in Texas Western District Court on behalf of Nephron Pharmaceuticals Corp., and Nephron Sterile Compounding Center LLC. The suit brings defamation, unfair competition and business disparagement claims against Denver Solutions LLC, doing business as Leiters Health, and Prodigy Health Supplier Corp. The complaint alleges the defendants falsely told customers that Nephron had stopped producing phenylephrine, an emergency drug used to prevent cardiac arrest. The plaintiffs allege the harm caused by these statements was particularly acute given that all sales communications with customers during the pandemic have been conducted remotely. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 1:21-cv-00081, Nephron Pharmaceuticals Corporation et al v. Prodigy Health Supplier Corporation et al. Stay up on the latest deals with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Boies Schiller's London Administrative Partner Is Headed to King & Spalding, Sources Say By Dylan Jackson
With In-Person Meet-Ups Scarce, This Firm Turned to Video Intros By Brenda Sapino Jeffreys
Florida State Will Try—for the Third Time—to Oust Segregationist Namesake From Its Law School Building By Karen Sloan
ROSS's 'Westlaw Monopoly' Claim Rings True—and Hollow—With Legal Research Market By Victoria Hudgins
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTo Ease Partner Pay Tensions, Some Law Firms Are Seeking 'Middle Ground' in Transparency
5 minute readSo You Want to Be a Tech Lawyer? Consider Product Counseling
Federal Judge Weighs In on School's Discipline for 'Explicitly Copying AI-Generated Text' on Project
Trump and Latin America: Lawyers Brace for US's Hardline Approach to Region
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250