So Far, Firms Not Planning to Require Vaccinations | Why Litigation Over Texas Power Outages Faces Long Odds | Ex-Client Sues Law Firm Over Involuntary Bankruptcy Proceeding: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
February 24, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
SHOTS ALL AROUND? - Davis Wright Tremaine was the first—and, so far, only—Am Law firm to publicly say it would mandate vaccination for attorneys who want to return to the office. And now it's looking like they may not have much company. As Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports, few Am Law 200 firms appear to be following Davis Wright's lead as the legal industry gears up for an expected return to in-person work by the second half of the year. Fish & Richardson, McGuireWoods, Stoel Rives and Shook Hardy have all said they will likely not require proof of vaccination as a condition to returning to their offices. Firms such as Proskauer Rose and Debevoise & Plimpton, meanwhile, have yet to decide. The trend tracks with a recent study by Gartner, which surveyed 236 human resources, legal, compliance and privacy leaders in December 2020 and January 2021, and found that only 8% of respondents said they will require their employees to get a COVID vaccines, though roughly 71% said they would "encourage" vaccination.
POWER STRUGGLE - Lawyers in Texas and elsewhere are gearing up for a fight in court over damages stemming from power outages that blanketed the Lone Star State during February's epic winter storm, Law.com's Amanda Bronstad reports. But suing electrical utilities can be tough sledding. For one thing, the lawsuits allege that the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the independent system operator for 26 million Texas residents who make up 90% of the state's electric load, is liable for failing to winterize equipment after past storms. But, as Heather Payne, associate professor of law at Seton Hall University School of Law in Newark, New Jersey, noted, ERCOT does not own the power plants. Nor does it control the weather. "There isn't any claim in Texas, at least that I have heard being made, that ERCOT's actions caused the weather. The weather caused the outages," Payne said.
OWE NO - A former client sued Minnesota law firm Morrison Sund yesterday in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court for abuse of process. Henry Stursberg, the owner of a Philadelphia mortgage brokerage and financial consulting firm, contends that the law firm wrongfully filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition against him to gain leverage in a fee dispute. "By using the 'hammer' of an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding as a debt collection device as to a disputed two party account, Morrison Sund used legal process against the Plaintiff for a purpose for which the process was not designed," the complaint alleges. Stursberg is represented by Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer. Counsel have not yet appeared for Morrison Sund. The case is 2:21-cv-00825, Stursberg v. Morrison Sund PLLC. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
With Retroactive 2-Year Suspension, Did Court 'Underplay' Gordon Caplan's Wrongdoing? By Jason Grant
Law.com Trendspotter: Not Having a Law Firm Succession Plan Is More Dangerous Than Ever By Raychel Lean ABA Won't Change Reporting Date for Law Grad Jobs Amid Pandemic By Karen Sloan Thanks to COVID, the Trend Toward Smaller Law Firm Office Space Has Been 'Accelerated by Almost a Decade' By Aleeza FurmanFive Great Fitness Trackers for Optimizing Health, Performance and Diet By Jonathan Jordan
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
BOUTIQUE'S BACK, ALRIGHT - Law.com International's Krishnan Nair is tracking a new trend in the U.K. and Europe: lawyers at the peak of their powers cutting away from their lucrative careers in elite private practices to start their own boutiques. The most high profile of these moves came at the start of February when a 38-strong Paris-headquarted arbitration team left Shearman & Sterling. But that was the continuation of a wider trend over the last 12 months, especially in the disputes world. One partner working at a boutique explained the growing appeal of such ventures, which he said are no longer reserved only for partners in the twilight of their careers. "It's the autonomy you just don't get in traditional practices," he said. "Boutiques are looking like an increasingly charming and fruitful way out of stiff politicized private practices."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"I would tell an associate who wants to make partner that they should view the partnership as something to join, not just something to achieve."
— Britney Willhite, partner at Irvine, California-based Allen Matkins, on the best piece of advice she could give an ambitious associate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWill Trump Be a Boost to Quinn Emanuel's Fortunes in China?
Pa. Judicial Nominee Advances While Trump Demands GOP Unity Against Biden Picks
4 minute readTrump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Law Firm Real Estate Strategy: Attorney Offices Are Out, Conference Rooms Are In
- 2AI Governance In Practice
- 3Section 1782 Practice Pointers From Recent Decisions
- 4Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 5Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250