Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.


WHAT WE'RE WATCHING

FACING ISSUES - When you really think about it, it's amazing how quickly all of us (well, most of us) adapted to interacting with each other in public while dressed like surgeons and ninjas. Still, exchanging pleasantries with the Whole Foods cashier through a mask is a far cry from trying to convince a 12-person jury that your client is innocent while the lights are glaring off their face shields or the Zoom connection is getting fuzzy. Whether in-person or virtual, pandemic-era court proceedings pose unique challenges for litigators trained to read and react to jurors' facial expressions. In this week's Law.com Litigation Trendspotter column, we look at the drawbacks of trying to connect with jurors through masks, shields and computer screens—as well as a few unexpected advantages. I'm interested to hear what you think: is it really possible to connect with a jury through face coverings and Zoom calls? Let me know at [email protected].

COUNSEL CULTURE - Have you ever wondered who in the corporate structure is responsible for transforming a company's "culture" from an amorphous buzzword to an actual concrete concept? Don't look now, but it's your friendly neighborhood GC. As Law.com's Heather Nevitt writes in this week's Law.com Barometer newsletter, in-house heads are increasingly expected to lead by example and help establish an ethical company culture that is deeply embedded and embraced throughout the organization. The bad news is: that ain't easy. The good news is it presents yet another opportunity for legal department leaders to show their value to their organization while also driving cross-business collaboration and the strategic mission of the company. To receive the Law.com Barometer directly to your inbox each week, click here.

EARLY RETIREMENT? - Edelson PC filed an ERISA lawsuit Thursday in Illinois Northern District Court against insurance broker Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. The complaint was filed on behalf of a longtime employee who claims he was terminated unexpectedly in order for the company to avoid paying him millions of dollars in retirement funds. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 1:21-cv-01650, Chung v. Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.


EDITOR'S PICKS