11. Efficient Work Methods Include Running a Lean Meeting
Learn how careful planning will make your meetings more efficient and effective in service to your client.
April 19, 2021 at 12:39 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
There is no secret to making meetings shorter and more effective. Just think about the tenets of lean, effectiveness, and efficiency, and then do some planning. (See Lean Meeting Planner.) Plan the work, the roles and the use of each project asset. Let's illustrate the dos and don'ts with a case study. Suppose Lawyer A is a trial partner based at a New York firm. Suppose his client has been sued in Texas. Lawyer A retains local counsel and decides to arrange an in-person case conference in Texas. A meeting like this is an everyday event, but it can still be handled efficiently or inefficiently:
Inefficient Unstructured Meeting |
1. Partner A decides to bring an associate to take notes and carry documents. 2. Partner A briefs associate. 3. Partner A drafts a comprehensive memo with instructions to the local counsel and sends these across ahead of time, with a full document pack. 4. Partner A doesn't send an agenda, but the instructions state that the purpose is to discuss evidence and merits. 5. Local counsel reads everything and prepares the subject widely. 6. The day before the trip, Partner A prepares a short agenda. Meanwhile associate prepares a conference plan. 7. The agenda and the conference plan are similar. The conference plan is much more detailed, but it never sees the light of day. 8. The case conference is unstructured, it doesn't follow the short agenda. 9. After a full day, the case conference ends with a discussion about what has been discussed. Local counsel offers to prepare a note of advice. 10. The next day Partner A asks associate to create a full conference note. Partner A later reviews and edits this and sends it to the client. 11. Two weeks later local counsel sends a note of advice to Partner A, who reviews it and sends it on to the client with a commentary. |
This doesn't look terrible. In fact, you can imagine this trip being narrated on an invoice in a way which appears to justify the expense. The meeting may still be somewhat effective, because in a roundabout way local counsel gets engaged and informed. But it's inefficient. The entire event is blighted by task duplication, wasted effort on non-core activities and lack of focus. All of this creates needless expense for the client which, in turn, is a misuse of funds, which are a vital project asset. This sort of squandering can be avoided by careful planning and assignment of roles. So now let's make it leaner.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawsuit Against Major Food Brands Could Be Sign of Emerging Litigation Over Processed Foods
3 minute readHow I Made Practice Group Leader: 'It’s a Job About People, First and Foremost,' Says Alexander Lees of Milbank
Was It Ever A Profession? A Look at the History of Law Firms as a Business with RJon Robins
1 minute readHow This Dark Horse Firm Became a Major Player in China
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250