7. Dealing With the New Reality
As the business world is becoming increasingly organized and connected, and general counsel and other buyers feel the squeeze, the buy-side now tells the sell-side how to operate. Given that raw demand is falling, law firms are paying attention.
April 27, 2021 at 08:45 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Lean Adviser
"A law firm should never take the client relationship for granted, because ten highly qualified firms are just waiting to take its place in line. Law firms that understand what makes us tick, take an interest in our objectives and find ways to promote them are the firms we are likely to engage for the long-term." — José Gonzalez, EVP& General Counsel, CNA, USA
It might be argued that law firms have no application tools because there is no requirement from clients for operational efficiency. If that was ever true, it isn't now.
For a century or more, law firms defined the legal services that they would offer and they set expectation parameters for clients. Now it is the opposite. The first clear inklings of this started a few years ago. Way back in March 2015, . Mark Chandler, General Counsel of Cisco, said that the goal of the smart attorney in private practice is to change the firm for the clients.
This was a perfect prediction and synopsis of where we are today, following a steadfast trajectory. As the business world is becoming increasingly organized and connected, and general counsel and other buyers feel the squeeze, the buy-side now tells the sell-side how to operate. Given that raw demand has been consistently falling and alternative legal service providers have been gaining traction, law firms are paying attention.
Law firms are subject to modernization and efficiency pressures in every sphere of practice. There is no sign that this is a blip or a fad. This is the new reality. Regulators, courts, but most of all clients, now care how law firms operate and they want them to be smarter.
The New Reality encompasses these key aspects:
- GCs face increased responsibilities, decreased budgets, and their role is changing. So is their approach.
- Clients would rather have light advice quickly, coupled with reasoned recommendations, than legal essays.
- Most of all, clients want problems solved and they are becoming 'supplier agnostic' about how they get this.
- The inflection point has arrived and the frame is broken. It's all up for grabs.
- Law firms are naturally resistant to change, but the agile, adaptable ones will use client voice to drive change.
The New Reality affects all legal service providers, regardless of size, skill, or reputation. Large clients with bigger legal budgets have the same pressures as small ones, and AmLaw 100 firms have the same challenges as boutiques. With the new reality comes the profound disruption that we have all seen. And with profound disruption, guess what also arises? Opportunity.
RELATED VIDEO: The New Reality
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLongtime AOC Director Glenn Grant to Step Down, Assignment Judge to Take Over
4 minute readHours After Trump Takes Office, Democratic AGs Target Birthright Citizenship Order
4 minute readHicks Johnson Promotes Lori Arakaki and Daniel Scime to Firm Partnership
2 minute readIAG Forensics & Valuation is excited to announce promotions at our firm effective 1/1/2025.
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250