Can the Boundaries Between Home and Work Ever Be Rebuilt? | Why E-Discovery Pros Are Looking Beyond Law Firms for New Gigs | UConn Sued for Eliminating Women's Rowing Team: The Morning Minute
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up. WHAT WE'RE WATCHING HOMEWORK - There once was a time, not so long ago,…
April 29, 2021 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
HOMEWORK - There once was a time, not so long ago, that commuting to and from an office served as a sort of dividing line between one's home life and one's work life. But the pandemic welded those two lives together and it's going take a lot more than a train ride or a traffic jam to rebuild the boundaries between them. The success of remote work means the proverbial toothpaste is out of the tube (and probably the literal toothpaste too if you have little kids at home while you're on Zoom calls all day). As Law.com's Patrick Smith reports, firms are struggling to figure out how to bring burnt-out lawyers and staff back to the office while also giving them the flexibility to work remotely and also trying to reestablish some semblance of the work-life balance that has been obliterated over the past year. Barbara Duffy, president of West Coast firm Lane Powell, told Smith the "wear and tear" on her firm's workforce after a year-plus of remote work is apparent, but the potential draws of coming back to the office have been muted by the effects of the pandemic as well. "You have to shut your door in your office if you don't want to wear a mask," she said. "And the downtown areas where our offices are have been battered. They aren't so inviting right now."
DISCOVERING NEW PATHS - It's a good time to be good at e-discovery—and law firms are still a good home for new law school grads hoping to get into that line of work. But there are other avenues young lawyers can take to hone those skills and they're starting to open up more than ever before, Law.com's Frank Ready reports. Kenneth Rashbaum, an adjunct professor of law at Fordham University and a partner at Barton, told Ready that while students are still primarily targeting law firms as their employment destination, alternative legal service providers and in-house legal departments are beginning to emerge as contenders for that talent as well. Meanwhile, more established e-discovery professionals could also be looking towards consultancies, software companies and other sources of employment in a post-pandemic industry. One job-seeker, who preferred to remain anonymous due to their ongoing job hunt, said they've interviewed with a law firm, but it's not their first choice. Instead, the source would like to find work at a consultancy where they can problem-solve both individually and as part of a larger team. "I would love that kind of a feeling," they said.
COURTROOM ROW - The University of Connecticut was hit with a civil rights class action Wednesday in Connecticut District Court. The action, filed by Duffy Law and Larew Law, alleges that UConn failed to comply with Title IX by eliminating the women's rowing team. "Plaintiffs seek to prevent UConn from discriminating against them based on their gender by providing, when compared to male student athletes: an unequal opportunity to participate in varsity intercollegiate athletics; unequal treatment and benefits; and unequal athletic financial assistance," the complaint says. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 3:21-cv-00583, Mlynek et al v. University of Connecticut. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGOP Now Holds FTC Gavel, but Dems Signal They'll Be a Rowdy Minority
6 minute read'Serious Legal Errors'?: Rival League May Appeal Following Dismissal of Soccer Antitrust Case
6 minute read28 Firms Supporting Retired Barnes & Thornburg Litigator in Georgia Supreme Court Malpractice Case
7 minute readHow Some Elite Law Firms Are Growing Equity Partner Ranks Faster Than Others
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Data Breaches in UK Legal Sector Surge, According to ICO Data
- 2PayPal Faces New Round of Claims; This Time Alleging Its 'Honey' Browser Extension Cheated Consumers
- 3Fired NLRB Member Seeks Reinstatement, Challenges President's Removal Power
- 4NY Inspector General Announces Attorneys Hired to Lead Upstate Region and Gaming
- 5Carol-Lisa Phillips to Rise to Broward Chief Judge as Jack Tuter Weighs Next Move
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250