Partners Want To Remain Remote, Devaluing E-Discovery, Employees Sue over Vaccination Mandate: The Morning Minute
Here's the news you need to start your day.
June 01, 2021 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
REMOTE REBELLION – Turns out that it's not just associates who aren't so keen to get back to the office. Some law firm partners are threatening to walk unless they can continue to work from home, Bruce Love reports. Allowing attorneys to work remotely on a permanent basis is the hot new recruiting tactic for firms looking to bring in laterals. For some partners, the ability to work from home is a must-have for any new position, recruiters say. The trend has crossed over into the in-house world too, with more lawyers looking for jobs that only require the occasional office visit. But not every firm and legal department is embracing this new demand for remote positions, out of concern that a virtual work environment will stymie mentorship opportunities for younger lawyers and chip away at firm culture.
LOWBALLING E-DISCOVERY – With courts reopening and organizations grappling with all the data created by collaboration and chat tools, demand for e-discovery experts is at an all-time high, with many e-discovery professionals now commanding salaries far beyond what they earned pre-pandemic. But as Frank Ready reports, not everyone is willing to pay a premium for this talent. Some law firms and legal departments continue to lowball e-discovery salaries, either because they haven't realized how much of a candidate's market it is yet, or they can't revise pre-approved salary budgets. While some are looking to solve the latter problem by offering bonuses to new e-discovery hires, these high salaries may still be cost-prohibitive for those looking to rein in spending. In fact, some may be rethinking the need to even fully staff an internal e-discovery department, especially when they can outsource much of that function to alternative legal service providers.
VAX PUSHBACK – A Houston hospital has been hit with a lawsuit by 117 employees challenging its COVID-19 vaccine requirement, Angela Morris reports. The plaintiffs are suing The Methodist Hospital, claiming they have been terminated from their jobs or are at risk of losing their jobs for refusing the "experimental" vaccine. The case will likely be closely watched in the employment law arena, as companies grapple with how best to manage their workforces as the pandemic wanes in the U.S. According to the suit, Methodist is the first major health care system in the country to make the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory for employees—a move it announced on April 1. The hospital says that 99% of its 26,000 workers have been vaccinated.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
Seattle Litigator David Ko Sees 'Silver Lining' of the Pandemic: Surprise! Technology Works
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllContract Software Unicorn Ironclad Hires Former Pinterest Lawyer as GC
2 minute readFlorida-Based Law Firms Start to Lag, As New York Takes a Bigger Piece of Deals
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250