The Real Reason Some Firms Are Being Vague About Office Returns | In-House Struggling to Lure Talent From Law Firms—and Might Be Better Off | Latham, Hughes Hubbard and Others Advise on $1.5B SPAC Merger: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
June 10, 2021 at 06:00 AM
6 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
CAN'T GO BACK - As we've noted in this space recently, many law firms have been less-than-straightforward in laying out their post-pandemic office return policies, often outwardly projected a posture of flexibility and understanding while appearing to subliminally signal to lawyers and staff that returning in-person sooner rather than later is not actually optional. Let's call it the "mom guilt" approach: as in, when your mom says that you certainly don't have to come home for Thanksgiving but she will be cooking and your siblings and extended family will all be flying in and, well, you should just do whatever you think is right. But, as Law.com's Andrew Maloney reports, the vague messaging by some firms may have a less nefarious explanation than veiled coercion. Instead, maybe just chalk it up to good old fashioned risk aversion. George Wolf Jr., a law firm consultant for Aon, told Maloney that firms have a general disinclination toward backtracking, which may explain why so many policies thus far have neglected to set a hard return date or fixed number of days that folks must show up to the office. "Most firms don't want to get out in front of the issue like that for fear of having to reverse course," he said. "Law firms pay very, very close attention to where their clients come out on these issues, and I don't think that is known or understood right now."
HIRE AWARENESS - It's becoming increasingly difficult for corporate legal departments to lure talented attorneys away from their lucrative positions in Big Law. As a result, many in-house counsel have begun focusing more on recruiting from other law departments. But that may be for the best, because lawyers who ditch law firm life for what they perceive to be a more leisurely pace in-house are likely in for a rude awakening at a time when remote work and budget constraints have combined to make corporate counsel positions at many companies incredibly stressful and demanding. As we examine in this week's Law.com Trendspotter column, the talent pool for in-house positions may be a bit smaller, but it's also likely stocked with more potential recruits who are better prepared for the realities of an in-house career. I'm interested to hear what you think: has corporate counsel life gotten more difficult during the pandemic? If so, do you think the perception of in-house work among job-seekers has shifted? Let me know at [email protected] and be sure to check out Corporate Counsel Advance, our new premium offering that brings you practical guidance content highlighting the evolving role and global nature of a GC, including leadership, business navigation, career development, and legal department management. CLICK HERE to subscribe.
NEGOTIATING POWER - Wall Box Chargers SL, a provider of electric vehicle charging stations, is going public via SPAC merger with Kensington Capital Acquisition Corp. II in a deal worth approximately $1.5 billion. As a result of the merger and related PIPE financing, Wall Box will be listed on the NYSE. The transaction, announced June 9, is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021. Wall Box, which is based in Barcelona, Spain, is represented by a Latham & Watkins team including partners Ignacio Gómez-Sancha, Ryan Maierson, Jose Sánchez-Dafos and Ian Schuman. The SPAC is advised by Hughes Hubbard & Reed; Houthoff Buruma; and Cuatrecasas, Gonçalves Pereira S.L.P. Chuck Samuelson led the Hughes Hubbard team, which also included partners Ken Lefkowitz, Andy Braiterman, Alan Kravitz, Gary Simon, Charles Wachsstock and Robert Bell. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
EDITOR'S PICKS
- Third Trial Over 3M Combat Earplugs Will Be a 'Tiebreaker'. Plus: Appeals Court Upholds Most of Equifax Settlement. By Ellen Bardash
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
CASH STASH - The U.K.'s largest 50 law firms rapidly increased their cash reserves by nearly 60% at the outset of the pandemic last year, according to an analysis of their 2019-20 limited liability accounts by auditor Smith & Williamson. At the end of April 2020, Law.com International's Hannah Roberts reports, the firms improved their cash position by an average of 57.2% as the U.K. went into lockdown and law firms shifted to remote working. In the previous three years, the biggest cash increase had been just 12.4% in the 2018-19 financial year. Giles Murphy, head of professional services at Smith & Williamson, told Roberts that the 57.2% rise was "a surprisingly positive statistic", but added that "it demonstrates just how uncertain and frightening the world was 12 months ago." "We can forget all too quickly the fear that was going around the whole business community at that time as to what this unprecedented event meant," he said. "Back then, anyone who was in a management position pulled every lever they could find to get money into the business."
WHAT YOU SAID
"In the past year, we've clipped approximately 10,000 news articles related to the court and the justices, roughly half of them tweets, just one indication of the growth in variety and breadth of coverage."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllChinese Firms Hire Partners from Kirkland and Paul Hastings in Hong Kong
Indian Law Firm Cyril Amarchand Rolls Out AI Strategy, Adopts Suite of AI Tools
Latest Boutique Combination in Florida Continues Am Law 200 Merger Activity
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Thursday Newspaper
- 2Public Notices/Calendars
- 3Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-117
- 4Rejuvenation of a Sharp Employer Non-Compete Tool: Delaware Supreme Court Reinvigorates the Employee Choice Doctrine
- 5Mastering Litigation in New York’s Commercial Division Part V, Leave It to the Experts: Expert Discovery in the New York Commercial Division
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250