The One Key Advantage for Firms Who Shun the Associate Pay Wars and More: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
June 17, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
QUALITY ASSURANCE- OK, the past week or so in Big Law has been a lot, so let's review: associate salaries have climbed again (and again and again); for elite firms, joining the pay wars is basically a no-brainer; for firms outside that rarified air, the calculus is dicier; clients are mildly annoyed; overseas law firm leaders are shaking their heads; and some staffers are downright cheesed off. But there's another angle here, lost in the melee: as Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports, many of the firms that boosted associate pay are going to need to recoup that money through rate hikes or increased billable hour targets, both of which can negatively impact attorneys of color and women. The bright side is that could create a recruitment opportunity for those firms that can't compete on compensation but are able to offer young lawyers—especially diverse young lawyers—a better quality of life than their competitors. "Firms that have not dedicated such a large portion of revenue to associate salaries will also have more resources to focus on inclusive practices and empowering their current talent. I believe most talent—including diverse talent—will flock to those firms and stay long-term," Caren Ulrich Stacy, founder and CEO of Diversity Lab, said.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ULTERIOR - Lawyers and former federal prosecutors say they're alarmed by a series of recent subpoena scandals implicating the Trump Justice Department, pointing to potential political motivations behind the subpoenas, Law.com's Andrew Goudsward and Jacqueline Thomsen report. "It really sounds like from the more information that comes out, that this is just sleazy, dirty stuff and it has the whiff of DOJ being politicalized and the investigative process being used to target folks who are less than complimentary to the president or his administration," said Michael Weinstein, a former Justice Department prosecutor who is now with Cole Schotz. "There are barriers and protocols and rules in place at the department to prevent that from happening and either they were lowered or they were just simply brushed aside it appears."
NO JOINT VENTURE - HBI International, seller of the Juicy brand cigarette and cigar rolling device, sued cannabis retailer Little Cottage Caregivers on Tuesday for declaratory judgment in a dispute arising from the defendant's purchase of 18 boxes of Juicy rollers. The suit, brought by Dickinson Wright in Arizona District Court, contends that Little Cottage improperly used the rolling devices to create marijuana cigarettes, then claimed the devices were defective and is now threatening litigation unless HBI pays $25 million. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:21-cv-01044, BBK Tobacco & Foods LLP v. Little Cottage Caregivers LLC. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
|- 'There Are Consequences for Your Body in This Career': How One Associate's Experience Led Her to Leave Law By Varsha Patel
- Law Students Weighed in on Pandemic Learning, Offering a Road Map for Legal Education's Future By Karen Sloan
- 'Slap in the Face': How Law Firm Staff Feel About Associate Raises By Patrick Smith
- 2 Jurors Fell Asleep in South Florida Case That Landed $2.5M Verdict By Michael A. Mora
- Law.com Trendspotter: Big Law's Big Credibility Problem When It Comes to Promoting Wellness and Work-Life Balance By Zack Needles
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
GATELEY UNLOCKED - U.K. listed law firm Gateley said it is "currently managing managing a cyber security incident" after discovering an intrusion into its systems, Law.com International's Meganne Tillay reports. The U.K. Top 50 firm said in a statement on the London Stock Exchange that the intrusion was "quickly identified" by its IT team, which acted immediately to secure its systems. The firm said it is "confident" that its security controls were effective in limiting the impact of the incident, and the firm's board has seen "no evidence" that the firm's financial performance has been impaired. The statement added that around 0.2% of Gateley's data was impacted by the incident, with some client data included in that. The firm said that it took its systems offline in response to the incident, but has now re-established its core systems, adding that "impacted data was traced quickly and deleted from the location to which it had been downloaded and there is no evidence currently to suggest that this data has been further disseminated."
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"It can be frustrating to attend event after event after event and meeting people who, like you, are just starting in their careers. But over time, those people grow up, get promoted and get into decision-making roles. If you are genuine and have stayed in contact, they will remember you."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Former CEO Allowed to Proceed with Discrimination Suit Against Commercial Litigation Funder, Judge Rules
4 minute readHow Qualcomm’s General Counsel Is Championing Diversity in Innovation
6 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-President of New York State Bar Dies at 95, as He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 2Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 3Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 4Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
- 5Foreign-Company Lobbyists Would Need to Register Under Proposed DOJ Regulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250