Millennial Lawyers' New Number One Priority and More: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
June 18, 2021 at 06:00 AM
4 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
YOUNG MONEY - Whereas previous generations of lawyers were driven by a singular focus on the almighty dollar, millennials have realigned their priorities. Indeed, the things they value can't be purchased with money—things like quality of life and the opportunity to do fulfilling wor… wait, what's that? Respondents to the 2021 Millennial Survey by Major, Lindsey & Africa and Above the Law said the most important factor in evaluating a potential employer is the compensation package? Nevermind then! As Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports, young lawyers do still care about things like work-life balance—which topped their priorities list in years past—but right now, quite simply, they're trying to get paid. Ru Bhatt, a partner in the associate practice group at Major, Lindsey & Africa, told Smith he interprets this change as partially driven by the millennial generation aging into more senior positions, as well as an admission that a good work-life balance in large firms may never be possible. "As you know, there have been many strides in the compensation war, and associates very much value that," Bhatt said. "I think what's very interesting is, with the deal flow and how busy things are, associates understand the work-life balance isn't something they may ever achieve in a service industry."
FORCE TO BE RECKONED WITH - Among several other dubious distinctions, 2020 was the year many folks who aren't contract lawyers learned what "force majeure" means. The pandemic brought about an onslaught of contract cancellations and subsequent fighting over whether the COVID-19 outbreak constituted such an event. But as we explore in this week's Law.com Litigation Trendspotter column, much of the litigation filed over this issue appears to be settling, as few parties have the stomach to face daunting court delays or the uncertainty of jury trials. Texas, however, endured not one but two major disruptions over the past year that sparked fierce force majeure debates: COVID-19 and Winter Storm Uri, which disabled Texas' energy grid in February. The latter, in particular, has triggered an avalanche of contract litigation unlike any even veteran litigators in the state say they've ever seen. And, unlike the COVID suits, most of those winter storm cases are not likely to wrap up neatly in the near future.
GAMING THE SYSTEM? - Pomerantz LLP and Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman filed a securities class action Thursday in California Northern District Court against Skillz, a gaming and esports platform that merged with a special purpose acquisition company in Dec. 2020. The suit accuses Skillz and its senior officers and directors of misleading investors regarding the platform's potential to attract new users and the popularity of its games. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendants. The case is 3:21-cv-04662, Schultz v. Skillz Inc. et al. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
| |- China's Wuhan Lab Can Be Sued Over COVID-19 Origins, but Can a Defendant Be Haled Into US Court? By Amanda Bronstad
- How I Made Law Firm Leader: Advice From Attorney Recruiting Committee Chairman Sandip Patel of Marshall, Gerstein & Borun By Tasha Norman
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
(IN)VESTED INTEREST - International and local law firms see the growing investment coming into Africa from India as a major opportunity, Law.com International's Jennigay Coetzer reports. Chris Parsons, chair, India practice and mental health champion at Herbert Smith Freehills, said global law firms will be able to act as international legal counsel for new deals, and African firms will benefit too. "It is frequently the case that deals of this nature will be structured under English law and be complex in nature, especially if the investment is into multiple geographies," he said. Now law firms on the continent are gearing up for an influx of work, and international firms ought to pay attention as well.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"She seems as near to a perfect nominee as you can expect for that court in light of her experience."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIt's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
4 minute readGeorgia July Bar Exam Results: Highest Overall Passing Rate in 10 Years
Summer Associates Want Gen AI Training. Is Big Law Providing It?
University of Georgia's School of Law Announces Programs to Fund More Attorneys in 'Legal Deserts'
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Ex-President of New York State Bar Dies at 95, as He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 2Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 3Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 4Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
- 5Foreign-Company Lobbyists Would Need to Register Under Proposed DOJ Regulation
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250