Fewer Lawyers Now Expect to Work Remotely: The Morning Minute
The news and analysis you need to start your day.
June 30, 2021 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here's the sign-up.
|
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING
WE'LL DO IT LIVE - It might be time to dig out the Tupperware and practice putting on pants because that whole "remote work revolution" thing that was supposed to sweep the legal industry as a result of the pandemic seems in danger of petering out. Recently, we noted that many large law firms' office return policies seemed to be not-so-subtly signaling that remaining fully remote or even mostly remote was not going to fly for much longer. Now, it seems like that message is sinking in. As Law.com's Dylan Jackson reports, the number of law firm leaders, attorneys and staff who expect to work from home frequently dropped significantly between 2020 and 2021, according to the The 2021 National Legal Sector Benchmark Survey Results published by Cushman & Wakefield in conjunction with ALM Intelligence and Law.com. Roughly 70% of respondents, which include 336 firm leaders, attorneys and staff from various law firms, said that they expect to regularly work remotely when asked in the second quarter of last year. Asked again earlier this year, just half responded the same way. Still, while rumors of the death of the office have been greatly exaggerated, the study's co-authors did say remote work is here to stay to some extent. "[I]t's clear that the virtual and remote work environment will continue to be a meaningful component of how and where work is performed by both lawyers and staff," the authors wrote. "The challenge for every firm is to determine the right mix that's most appropriate to their attorneys."
STATE OF CYBERSECURITY LAW - The U.S. Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling last Friday requiring plaintiffs to show "concrete" injuries in consumer privacy and data breach class actions was a pleasant way for the business community to kick off its weekend. But, as Law.com's Victoria Hudgins reports, the celebration could prove to be short-lived, as the decision is likely to simply push more plaintiffs to state courts, where the issues in these types of cases are still largely unsettled. "On its face it looks like it could be pro-business," said Cynthia Cole, a partner and deputy department chairwoman of Baker Botts' corporate section. "It looks like it could be a decision that gives some consistency to businesses in this context. But I think it's a decision that punts the real issues and stickiness and problems underlying data breaches: inaccuracy of information and the harm inaccurate information can cause."
MULTIPLE MAJOR MERGERS - You know what they say about omni-channel and omni-vertical customer acquisition platform mergers: once you pop, you can't stop. System1 is going public through a SPAC merger with Trebia Acquisition Corp. in a deal worth approximately $1.4 billion. As a result of the merger, System1 will be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Simultaneously, System1 has also agreed to merge with cybersecurity company Protected.net. Both transactions, announced June 29, are expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2021. System1, which is based in Los Angeles, is represented by Latham & Watkins and Willkie Farr & Gallagher. The SPAC is advised by Weil, Gotshal & Manges. Protected.net is represented by Trethowans and Greenberg Glusker. Stay up on the latest deals and litigation with the new Law.com Radar.
|
EDITOR'S PICKS
| |- The Latest Mansfield Certification Round Is Shining Light on Law Firm Staff Diversity By Dylan Jackson
- 'We Get Back a Commitment From Them': Why Katten Decided to Raise Business Pro Salaries Across the Board By Patrick Smith
- 'What Happened to the Money': Here's What You Won't Hear During Michael Avenatti's Criminal Trial By Meghann M. Cuniff
- In NY Appeals Court's Suspension of Giuliani, Some See 'Courageous' Move, Others See an Overreach By Jason Grant
|
WHILE YOU WERE SLEEPING
DEAL DASH - Tech-related deal work is ballooning in Latin America, bringing with it greater demand for U.S.-based legal advice and talent, Law.com International's Amy Guthrie reports. Lawyers active in the space say venture capital invested into the region over the years has spawned a growing number of exit transactions that in turn give tech pioneers currency to undertake acquisitions. The result has been a notable increase in both inbound and outbound work—and a recruiting drive for talent at tech-focused law firms as well as at full-service firms hoping to get in on the action. "We're starting to see companies blowing out of the gate with billion-dollar valuations, and the market is becoming more and more mature," said André Thiollier, a partner at Foley & Lardner who focuses on tech in Latin America—and in particular Brazil.
|
WHAT YOU SAID
"If you're working with a partner who you don't think will be your advocate, branch out to find someone who will."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrump Likely to Keep Up Antitrust Enforcement, but Dial Back the Antagonism
5 minute readAs Tech-Focused Roles in C-Suite Expand, Newcomers Embrace Big Law Opportunities
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250